BMW F 800 R 2009 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - BMW F 800 R 2009 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

The BMW F 800 R model year 2009 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2010 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine performance, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 has a clear advantage. It boasts an inline three-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1050cc, producing an impressive 131 horsepower and 105 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R is equipped with an inline two-cylinder engine with a displacement of 798cc, delivering 87 horsepower and 86 Nm of torque. This means that the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 offers more power and torque, resulting in a more exhilarating ride.

When it comes to braking, both bikes feature four-piston front brakes, ensuring reliable stopping power. The dimensions of the front and rear tires are the same for both models, with a diameter of 17 inches. This provides stability and grip on the road, allowing for confident cornering.

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are some notable differences. The BMW F 800 R has a longer wheelbase of 1520mm, compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050's 1429mm wheelbase. This may affect the handling and maneuverability of the bikes, with the BMW potentially offering more stability at higher speeds. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 820mm, compared to the Triumph's 815mm seat height. Additionally, the BMW F 800 R has a dry weight of 177kg, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 weighs slightly more at 189kg.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW F 800 R has a larger capacity of 19 liters, compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050's 18 liters. This may result in longer riding range for the BMW, as it can hold more fuel.

When it comes to strengths, the BMW F 800 R is praised for its high-quality components, great engine performance, and good equipment options. It also offers a comfortable cockpit and a positive chassis, providing a smooth and enjoyable ride. Additionally, the BMW has a reputation for low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice for riders.

On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 stands out with its increased power and torque, as well as reduced weight. It offers improved agility and geometry, allowing for precise and fast handling. These features make the Triumph an excellent choice for riders seeking a more dynamic and thrilling riding experience.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The BMW F 800 R is criticized for its high price, which may deter some potential buyers. Additionally, some riders find the first gear to be a little too long, affecting the bike's acceleration. The BMW's aesthetics are also mentioned as a weakness by some riders.

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050's main weakness is that it may not be suitable for riders weighing over 100kg, as they might experience space problems on the bike.

In conclusion, the BMW F 800 R 2009 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers high-quality components, a great engine, and good equipment options, while the Triumph provides more power, torque, and agility. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Caractéristiques techniques BMW F 800 R 2009 par rapport à Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

BMW F 800 R 2009
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

Type de moteurType de moteurEn ligneType de moteurEn ligne
AlésageAlésage82 mmAlésage79 mm
CourseCourse75.6 mmCourse71.4 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur87 chPuissance du moteur131 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.8,000 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.9,250 tr/min
CoupleCouple86 NmCouple105 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple6,000 tr/minTr/min au couple7,550 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression12 Taux de compression12
CylindresCylindres2Cylindres3
CylindréeCylindrée798 cm³Cylindrée1,050 cm³

Freins avant

PistonPistonQuatre pistonsPistonQuatre pistons
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixeFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixe

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonPiston uniquePistonDouble piston
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottant

Dimensions et poids

Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
LongueurLongueur2,145 mmLongueur2,115 mm
LargeurLargeur905 mmLargeur780 mm
HauteurHauteur1,160 mmHauteur1,120 mm
EmpattementEmpattement1,520 mmEmpattement1,429 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle820 mmHauteur de selle815 mm
Poids à secPoids à sec177 kgPoids à sec189 kg
Capacité du réservoir de carburantCapacité du réservoir de carburant19 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant18 l
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

BMW F 800 R 2009

BMW F 800 R 2009

Dans la publicité, la nouvelle BMW F 800 R passe en partie pour une moto de femme. Ce n'est certes pas un tort pour la moto, mais le moteur civilisé, la hauteur de selle basse et les commandes souples conviennent également aux femmes de petite taille.

Composants de haute qualité

moteur formidable

bonnes options possibles

cockpit

châssis positif

faible consommation.

Prix élevé

démultiplication de la première vitesse un peu trop longue

optique.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

L'euphorie s'est répandue dans les longs virages. La Triple est justement un peu plus chère que n'importe quel naked nippon avec des suspensions bon marché, et on le sent. Elle reste stable, on peut ouvrir les gaz violemment et la ligne est précise.

Plus de puissance

couple accru

poids réduit

agilité

géométrie fortement améliorée

précis et rapide.

les personnes de >100kg pourraient avoir des problèmes de place

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW F 800 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 800 R 2009 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 57 days compared to 58 days for the BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 800 R was published on 10/10/2008 and now has more than 8,900 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.

Prix BMW F 800 R

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH