Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 model year 2010 and the Triumph Speed Triple R model year 2012 are both naked bikes with similar engine specifications. They both have an in-line engine type, 3 cylinders, and a displacement of 1050cc. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Speed Triple R 2012 has a slight advantage with 135 HP compared to the Speed Triple 1050 2010's 131 HP. The Speed Triple R also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the 105 Nm of the Speed Triple 1050.
Both models have liquid cooling systems and aluminum frames with a twin tube design. The front suspension on the Speed Triple 1050 is an upside-down telescopic fork from Showa, while the Speed Triple R features a telescopic fork from Öhlins. Both suspensions have compression and rebound adjustment. The rear suspension on both models is from Showa, but the Speed Triple R has the added feature of preload adjustment.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
When it comes to braking, both models have four-piston front calipers with radial technology. However, the Speed Triple R has the advantage of monoblock calipers, which provide even greater braking performance.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Speed Triple R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1435mm compared to the Speed Triple 1050's 1429mm. The seat height of the Speed Triple R is also slightly higher at 825mm compared to the 815mm of the Speed Triple 1050. The Speed Triple R has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters compared to the 18 liters of the Speed Triple 1050.
In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 2010 offers more power and increased torque compared to the Speed Triple R 2012. It also has reduced weight, making it more agile and offering improved geometry. The Speed Triple 1050 is known for its precise and fast performance.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
On the other hand, the Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis and is known for its very precise handling. It offers relatively stable performance and has inspiring looks. The engine of the Speed Triple R is also highly regarded, and it features stable brakes with the added advantage of monoblock calipers.
In terms of weaknesses, the Speed Triple 1050 2010 may have space problems for individuals weighing over 100kg. The Speed Triple R 2012 requires wider radii when turning and may be somewhat complicated to ride in turns. It also has weaknesses in terms of comfort.
Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 and the Speed Triple R 2012 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two models would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether they prioritize power and agility or precise handling and racing performance.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 par rapport à Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010
L'euphorie s'est répandue dans les longs virages. La Triple est justement un peu plus chère que n'importe quel naked nippon avec des suspensions bon marché, et on le sent. Elle reste stable, on peut ouvrir les gaz violemment et la ligne est précise.
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012
La R se comporte avec plus de précision et de calme que jamais. Elle est garantie de garder son sang-froid même lorsque son pilote l'a peut-être déjà jetée au loin. L'inconvénient de ce concentré de puissance compact est que les rayons doivent être un peu plus larges et le parcours un peu plus rapide pour que la véritable reine d'Angleterre puisse jouer de ses 4 as dans la manche.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Speed Triple R
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 57 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.
