Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs. Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023
Vue d’ensemble - Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 vs Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023
The Kawasaki ER-6f model year 2009 and the Kawasaki Ninja 650 model year 2023 are both sport touring motorcycles with similar technical specifications. They have an in-line engine type with a bore of 83 mm and a stroke of 60 mm. The engine power of the ER-6f is slightly higher at 72 HP compared to the Ninja 650's 68.2 HP. The torque of the ER-6f is also slightly higher at 66 Nm compared to the Ninja 650's 65.7 Nm. Both motorcycles have a compression ratio of around 10.8 to 11.3 and are equipped with a 649ccm displacement engine.
In terms of chassis, both the ER-6f and the Ninja 650 have a steel frame. They also have the same front and rear tire diameter of 17 inches. However, there is a slight difference in seat height, with the ER-6f having a seat height of 785 mm and the Ninja 650 having a seat height of 790 mm. The fuel tank capacity of the ER-6f is 15.5 liters, while the Ninja 650 has a slightly smaller fuel tank capacity of 15 liters.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
When comparing the strengths of the two motorcycles, the ER-6f 2009 is known for its powerful sound, mobility, reasonable price, visually sophisticated design, and safe riding experience. It is also considered beginner-friendly, making it a suitable choice for riders who are new to sport touring motorcycles. On the other hand, the Ninja 650 2023 is praised for its suitability for touring, comfortable ride, safety package, and accessibility. It offers an ergonomically versatile riding position and features the typical Ninja look, which is appealing to many riders.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023
However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The ER-6f's 72 HP engine may not provide the same level of power as some other sport touring motorcycles. On the other hand, the Ninja 650's chassis and brakes are considered average, and adjusting the rear shock absorber can be laborious.
In conclusion, the Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 and the Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023 are both sport touring motorcycles with similar technical specifications. While the ER-6f offers a more powerful engine, the Ninja 650 provides a more comfortable and versatile riding experience. Both motorcycles have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 par rapport à Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Qu'il s'agisse de se rendre au travail ou de faire de longues randonnées, la position d'assise agréable, le bicylindre en ligne silencieux et sans vibrations ainsi que l'agilité des épingles apportent du plaisir à la conduite dans toutes les situations.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023
Juger la Kawasaki Ninja 650 uniquement sur papier serait une grave erreur. Le test de deux jours a montré une fois de plus que les données de performance ont plus de poids à la conversation de bistrot que dans la nature. La moto de tourisme sportive de Kawa fait exactement ce qu'elle est censée faire et, grâce à son remaniement constant et aux nouvelles caractéristiques ajoutées pour 2023, elle continue d'enrichir la catégorie. Seuls les coureurs amateurs doivent être mis en garde, car le nom Ninja continue d'attiser une certaine attente que la 650 ne satisfait pas entièrement.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Kawasaki ER-6f vs Kawasaki Ninja 650
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6f 2009 and a Kawasaki Ninja 650 2023. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6f with 70 days compared to 137 days for a Kawasaki Ninja 650. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6f and 20 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6f was published on 1/25/2006 and now has more than 30,200 views. This compares to more than 79,600 views for the first review on Kawasaki Ninja 650 published on 10/4/2016.