Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016
The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, inline three-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a slight advantage with 115 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 106 HP. The Yamaha also has higher torque at 87.5 Nm compared to the Triumph's 68 Nm. The Yamaha's larger displacement of 847ccm also contributes to its increased power output.
Both bikes have three cylinders and share similar suspension setups with telescopic forks in the front. However, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 features an upside-down telescopic fork, which is generally considered to provide better performance and stability.
In terms of chassis, both models have a twin tube frame type, which provides good rigidity and stability. The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1440mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 1410mm. This may contribute to the Yamaha's stability at higher speeds.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
The seat height of the Yamaha MT-09 2016 is slightly higher at 815mm compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 805mm. Both bikes have similar tire sizes with a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 180mm, both with a diameter of 17 inches.
In terms of weight, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 is lighter at 167kg compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 188kg. This lighter weight may contribute to the Triumph's light-footed handling and improved performance.
The fuel tank capacity of the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 is larger at 17.4 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 14 liters. This may give the Triumph a longer range before needing to refuel.
Yamaha MT-09 2016
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 is praised for its light weight, improved performance, and light-footed handling. It is also considered extremely practical in curves and offers a comfortable upright seating position.
The Yamaha MT-09 2016 is praised for its wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, offering three power modes for different riding conditions. It also has a fully adjustable chassis, a quickshifter as standard, good brakes, and an aggressive look. The sporty upright seating position and traction control are also considered strengths.
As for weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 does not come with ABS as standard, although it can be purchased separately. The Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that some find too hard for long tours and a license plate holder on the swingarm that offers less splash protection than a conventional one.
In conclusion, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers a lighter weight and improved performance, while the Yamaha boasts a more powerful engine and additional features such as power modes and a quickshifter. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 par rapport à Yamaha MT-09 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Il suffit de la moindre impulsion pour que la petite anglaise tourne exactement comme on l'a souhaité. Cette maniabilité n'a pas non plus d'équivalent dans la catégorie des naked bikes de taille moyenne. Une moto qui peut être conduite de manière aussi sportive n'aurait pas mérité d'être utilisée comme dévoreuse de kilomètres et comme paquebot.
Yamaha MT-09 2016
La Yamaha MT-09 n'a pas eu besoin d'être réinventée pour la saison à venir - elle l'a déjà été extrêmement bien il y a à peine quatre ans. Au lieu de cela, les Japonais ont misé sur un réglage fin et l'ajout de gadgets pratiques, adaptés à l'époque, comme le contrôle de traction et le changement de vitesse automatique. La norme Euro4 a une fois de plus modifié la gestion du moteur qui, en mode standard, offre un développement de la puissance certes puissant, mais bien contrôlable. Le plus grand changement, reconnaissable au premier coup d'œil, est le design, à mon avis très réussi, avec l'avant plus agressif et l'arrière redessiné. Dans l'ensemble, il s'agit donc d'une naked bike encore plus élégante, qui a clairement été construite pour le plaisir de conduire une moto.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Triumph Street Triple 675 R vs Yamaha MT-09
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 675 R with 73 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R was published on 7/20/2008 and now has more than 13,000 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.
