Kawasaki Z1000 2014 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - Kawasaki Z1000 2014 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017

The Kawasaki Z1000 model year 2014 and the Kawasaki Z900 model year 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line 4-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models in terms of specifications and performance.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z1000 2014 has a higher output with 142 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017 which has 125.4 HP. This means that the Z1000 may have a slight advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. However, the Z900 compensates for this with its perfectly dimensioned torque of 98.6 Nm, which allows for excellent responsiveness and revving up willingly.

Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal engine temperature regulation. The Z1000 has a displacement of 1043 ccm, while the Z900 has a slightly smaller displacement of 948 ccm. This difference in displacement may result in a slight variation in overall performance and fuel efficiency.

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Z1000 offers more adjustment options with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments, while the Z900 only has preload and rebound adjustments. This means that the Z1000 allows for more fine-tuning of the suspension to suit individual preferences and riding conditions.

The chassis of the Z1000 is made of aluminum, which provides a lightweight yet sturdy frame. On the other hand, the Z900 has a steel frame, which may add a bit more weight but also offers durability and stability.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. The Z1000 has radial technology and petal design, while the Z900 only has petal technology. This may result in slightly different braking performance, with the Z1000 potentially offering slightly better braking capabilities.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Z1000 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the Z900 has a slightly narrower rear tire width of 180 mm. The wheelbase of the Z1000 is 1435 mm, slightly shorter than the Z900's 1450 mm. Additionally, the seat height of the Z1000 is 815 mm, while the Z900 has a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

In terms of strengths, the Z1000 is praised for its sophisticated design, pleasant handling, pleasant sound, and good brakes. On the other hand, the Z900 is commended for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and the engine's fine response and perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also noted that the Z900 offers an optimum intersection of performance, price, and practical use.

However, the Z1000 is criticized for its high purchase price compared to other models such as the S1000R. The Z900, on the other hand, is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for tall riders. It is suggested that tall riders may need to order another seat to address this issue.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Z1000 2014 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The Z1000 offers a higher engine power and more suspension adjustment options, while the Z900 excels in its chassis design and engine performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Caractéristiques techniques Kawasaki Z1000 2014 par rapport à Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 2014
Kawasaki Z900 2017
Afficher tout
Identique uniquement
Différences
Kawasaki Z1000 2014
Kawasaki Z1000 2014
Kawasaki Z900 2017
Kawasaki Z900 2017

Moteur et chaîne cinématique

Type de moteurType de moteurEn ligneType de moteurEn ligne
AlésageAlésage77 mmAlésage73.4 mm
CourseCourse56 mmCourse56 mm
Puissance du moteurPuissance du moteur142 chPuissance du moteur125.4 ch
Tr/min à la puissance max.Tr/min à la puissance max.10,000 tr/minTr/min à la puissance max.9,500 tr/min
CoupleCouple111 NmCouple98.6 Nm
Tr/min au coupleTr/min au couple7,300 tr/minTr/min au couple7,700 tr/min
Taux de compressionTaux de compression11.8 Taux de compression11.8
Type d’embrayageType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huileType d’embrayageMultidisque à bain d’huile
AllumageAllumageDigitalAllumageDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChaîneTransmissionChaîne
Nombre de vitessesNombre de vitesses6Nombre de vitesses6
CylindresCylindres4Cylindres4
TempsTemps4 tempsTemps4 temps
RefroidissementRefroidissementliquideRefroidissementliquide
CylindréeCylindrée1,043 cm³Cylindrée948 cm³

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantFourche télescopique inverséeSuspension avantFourche télescopique inversée
AjustementAjustementCompression, Précharge, DétenteAjustementPrécharge, Détente

Châssis

CadreCadreAluminiumCadreAcier
Type de cadreType de cadreDouble berceauType de cadreDouble berceau

Freins avant

TypeTypeDouble disqueTypeDouble disque
PistonPistonQuatre pistonsPistonQuatre pistons
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier semi flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixe
TechnologieTechnologieradial, PétaleTechnologiePétale

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonPiston uniquePistonPiston unique

Dimensions et poids

Largeur du pneu avantLargeur du pneu avant120 mmLargeur du pneu avant120 mm
Hauteur du pneu avantHauteur du pneu avant70 %Hauteur du pneu avant70 %
Diamètre du pneu avantDiamètre du pneu avant17 poucesDiamètre du pneu avant17 pouces
Largeur du pneu arrièreLargeur du pneu arrière190 mmLargeur du pneu arrière180 mm
Hauteur du pneu arrièreHauteur du pneu arrière50 %Hauteur du pneu arrière55 %
Diamètre du pneu arrièreDiamètre du pneu arrière17 poucesDiamètre du pneu arrière17 pouces
LongueurLongueur2,045 mmLongueur2,070 mm
LargeurLargeur790 mmLargeur820 mm
HauteurHauteur1,055 mmHauteur1,065 mm
EmpattementEmpattement1,435 mmEmpattement1,450 mm
Hauteur de selleHauteur de selle815 mmHauteur de selle795 mm
Conformité au permisConformité au permisAConformité au permisA

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Kawasaki Z1000 2014

Une superbe moto qui ne convainc pas en premier lieu par des faits, mais par une sensation de conduite positive ainsi que par des émotions.

Design sophistiqué

performance de conduite extrêmement agréable

son agréable

bons freins.

Prix d'achat élevé - par rapport à la S1000R.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Une moto très réussie. Elle est le fruit de nombreux tests et d'un grand souci du détail. Elle a exactement la bonne puissance, exactement le bon châssis et exactement le bon look. Une nakedbike parfaitement réussie qui te rendra heureux pendant longtemps. Si tu veux, tu peux la conduire simplement et fidèlement, mais si tu le souhaites, elle peut aussi être ultra-rapide et vrombir méchamment. Superbe !

Châssis génial pour nakedbike

aspect magnifique

le moteur répond avec une grande finesse, monte facilement en régime et dispose d'un couple parfaitement dimensionné

point d'intersection optimal entre performance, prix et utilité pratique

Angle du genou très étroit pour les personnes de grande taille (commander une autre banquette !)

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Kawasaki Z1000 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z1000 2014 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z1000 2014 is about 3% higher. A Kawasaki Z1000 2014 experiences a loss of 660 USD in one year and 490 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 520 USD and 920 USD for a Kawasaki Z900 2017. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017 there are less Kawasaki Z1000 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 12 compared to 43. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z1000 with 75 days compared to 85 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 41 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z1000 was published on 9/2/2002 and now has more than 5,800 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Prix Kawasaki Z1000

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix Kawasaki Z900

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen