Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs. Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Vue d’ensemble - Yamaha XSR900 2016 vs Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
The Yamaha XSR900 2016 and the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 are both naked bikes with similar wheelbase measurements and liquid cooling systems. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 boasts 115 HP compared to the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007's 98 HP. This makes the XSR900 more powerful and potentially more thrilling to ride. Additionally, the XSR900 has a three-cylinder engine, while the FZ6-N S2 has a four-cylinder engine. The XSR900's larger displacement of 847 ccm also contributes to its increased power.
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Both bikes have similar dimensions and weights, with a wheelbase of 1440 mm. However, there are slight differences in seat height and fuel tank capacity. The XSR900 has a seat height of 815 mm, while the FZ6-N S2 has a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm. The FZ6-N S2 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 19.4 liters, compared to the XSR900's 14 liters.
In terms of strengths, the XSR900 stands out for its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and standard ABS and TC features. It also has an authentic modern design and clean workmanship. On the other hand, the FZ6-N S2 is praised for its beautiful appearance, one-piece cast brake calipers, high-quality anodized dip tubes, FZ1 cockpits, brakes, and optimum seating position.
However, there are some weaknesses to consider as well. The XSR900 has a hard chassis, which may affect the overall comfort of the ride. The seat could also be more comfortable, which may be a drawback for longer rides. Additionally, the speedblock design of the XSR900 is already present on many other Yamaha models, which may make it less unique.
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
In comparison, the FZ6-N S2 has a surcharge to standard, which may make it less accessible to some buyers. Additionally, the engine of the FZ6-N S2 is weaker in the lower rev range, which may affect its overall performance.
Overall, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 offers a more powerful engine and modern features, while the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007 has a beautiful appearance and unique design elements. The choice between the two models ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Caractéristiques techniques Yamaha XSR900 2016 par rapport à Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Yamaha XSR900 2016
La XSR900 allie les performances d'un streetfighter sportif à l'esthétique d'un naked bike rétro aux finitions soignées. Pour ce faire, les Japonais se servent de leur propre histoire, qui se trouve concentrée et sans faille dans les archives de l'agence de design travaillant depuis 60 ans pour Yamaha. Elle reprend les vertus de la MT-09 et a corrigé quelques-unes de ses faiblesses. Elle se conduit de manière plus harmonieuse, plus contrôlée et, si on le souhaite, plus détendue. Seul le confort, et donc le pilote, souffre de la fermeté du châssis sur les mauvaises routes. Il faut être capable de souffrir un tout petit peu avec un néo-classique.
Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007
Les performances de la Yamaha FZ6-N Spec II sont donc à la hauteur de son apparence. Une moto très agréable à conduire, mais sur laquelle les pilotes expérimentés ne devraient pas se lasser.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Yamaha XSR900 vs Yamaha FZ6-N S2
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 2016 and a Yamaha FZ6-N S2 2007. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha FZ6-N S2 with 59 days compared to 77 days for the Yamaha XSR900. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 and 6 reviews for the Yamaha FZ6-N S2 since model year 2007. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 was published on 11/25/2015 and now has more than 17,600 views. This compares to more than 31,700 views for the first review on Yamaha FZ6-N S2 published on 10/13/2006.
