BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. BMW R 1250 GS 2021
BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW R 1250 GS 2021
Vue d’ensemble - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs BMW R 1250 GS 2021
The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 are both impressive motorcycles, each with their own unique features and strengths.
Starting with the BMW S 1000 R 2016, it is a naked bike with a powerful and well-controllable engine. With an engine power of 160 HP and torque of 112 Nm, it offers exhilarating performance. The transmission is chain-driven, providing smooth and efficient power delivery. The bike has a 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999 ccm, offering plenty of power for thrilling rides.
In terms of suspension, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 features an upside-down telescopic fork at the front with a diameter of 46 mm, providing excellent stability and control. The rear suspension consists of a swing arm with a monoshock, ensuring a comfortable and smooth ride. The frame of the bike is made of aluminum, which offers a good balance between rigidity and weight.
The braking system of the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is impressive, with double disk brakes at the front and four-piston calipers. The radial technology used in the brakes enhances the braking performance and provides excellent stopping power.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
One of the strengths of the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is its comfortable seating position, allowing the rider to enjoy long rides without fatigue. Additionally, the bike is equipped with advanced rider assistance systems, including dynamic suspension, which enhances the overall riding experience.
On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is an enduro motorcycle with a boxer engine. It has a slightly lower engine power of 136 HP but compensates with a higher torque of 143 Nm. The transmission is a prop shaft, which offers a smooth and reliable power transfer. The bike has a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1254 ccm, providing a good balance between power and efficiency.
The suspension system of the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 consists of a telelever at the front with a diameter of 37 mm, offering excellent stability and control even on rough terrains. The rear suspension features a single swing arm with a monoshock, ensuring a comfortable and smooth ride.
The frame of the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is made of steel and has a load-bearing engine design, providing a sturdy and durable structure. The braking system is similar to the BMW S 1000 R 2016, with double disk brakes at the front and four-piston calipers.
One of the strengths of the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is its great ride comfort and ergonomics. The bike is designed to provide a comfortable and relaxed riding position, making it suitable for long journeys. It also comes with a great connectivity app, an easy-to-read display, and practical riding aids, enhancing the overall riding experience.
BMW R 1250 GS 2021
The BMW R 1250 GS 2021 also offers a confident feel in the saddle, allowing the rider to tackle various terrains with ease. The versatile chassis accommodates every route, making it a versatile and capable motorcycle.
However, the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 does have some weaknesses. Its overall appearance may be considered rough by some, and the gearshifts at low revs can be somewhat clumsy.
In comparison, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has irresistible but expensive optional extras, which may not be suitable for every budget. Additionally, the chassis of the bike is hard, which can affect the overall comfort on long rides.
In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 are impressive motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 offers a powerful engine and a comfortable seating position, while the BMW R 1250 GS 2021 provides great ride comfort, practical riding aids, and a versatile chassis. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the motorcycle.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW S 1000 R 2016 par rapport à BMW R 1250 GS 2021
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Sur la BMW S 1000 R, on remarque à la fois la parenté étroite avec la Superbike S 1000 RR et la volonté de doter la machine d'un niveau de confort élevé pour la route et le quotidien. Le moteur quatre cylindres de 1000 cm3 se met donc au travail de manière brutale, tout en restant bien contrôlable, et la position de conduite est par conséquent confortable et sportive. Le fait que la S 1000 R soit l'une des power naked bikes les plus abordables est surprenant et réjouissant, mais il ne faut pas pour autant mettre la main sur la liste des équipements spéciaux - car grâce aux nombreuses caractéristiques irrésistibles, elle sera certainement plus chère.
BMW R 1250 GS 2021
Lors du test de novembre 2021, la GS a de nouveau enthousiasmé par sa polyvalence. Nous avons conduit la moto sur les terrains les plus divers et avons été une fois de plus très satisfaits. La moto convainc dans toutes les situations par sa facilité d'utilisation et son côté pratique. D'un autre côté, elle peut aussi être conduite de manière délicieusement déraisonnable.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW S 1000 R vs BMW R 1250 GS
There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a BMW R 1250 GS 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1250 GS 2021 is about 70% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 380 USD in one year and 1,940 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 350 USD and 290 USD for a BMW R 1250 GS 2021. Compared to BMW R 1250 GS 2021 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 66. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1250 GS with 55 days compared to 69 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 50 reviews for the BMW R 1250 GS since model year 2019. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 305,600 views for the first review on BMW R 1250 GS published on 9/19/2018.
