Yamaha YZ450F 2016 vs. Husqvarna FC 450 2016
Yamaha YZ450F 2016
Husqvarna FC 450 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Yamaha YZ450F 2016 vs Husqvarna FC 450 2016
The Yamaha YZ450F 2016 and the Husqvarna FC 450 2016 are both motocross bikes that offer powerful performance and excellent handling. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine specifications, the Yamaha YZ450F has a bore of 97 mm and a stroke of 60.8 mm, while the Husqvarna FC 450 has a slightly smaller bore of 95 mm and a longer stroke of 63.4 mm. The Yamaha YZ450F has a compression ratio of 12.5, while the Husqvarna FC 450 has a slightly higher compression ratio of 12.6. Both bikes have a single cylinder and are 4-stroke engines with a displacement of 449 ccm for the Yamaha and 449.3 ccm for the Husqvarna.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and shock mount deflection at the rear. This provides excellent stability and control during off-road riding.
Yamaha YZ450F 2016
When it comes to the chassis, the Yamaha YZ450F features an aluminum frame, while the Husqvarna FC 450 has a steel frame. The Yamaha's frame is of the twin tube type, while the Husqvarna's frame is a central tube design. Both frames are known for their durability and rigidity, contributing to the bikes' overall stability and handling.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front tire width of 80 mm and front tire diameter of 21 inches. The rear tire width is also the same at 110 mm, with a diameter of 19 inches. The Yamaha has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1480 mm, compared to the Husqvarna's 1495 mm. The seat height of the Yamaha is 965 mm, while the Husqvarna's seat height is slightly higher at 992 mm.
Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The Yamaha YZ450F 2016 is praised for its powerful engine, which delivers impressive performance on the track. It also offers adjustable mappings, allowing riders to customize the bike's performance to their preferences. The Yamaha has a solid chassis and good handling, making it easy to maneuver on different terrains. Additionally, riders appreciate the smooth and pleasant gearshifting experience.
Husqvarna FC 450 2016
On the other hand, the Husqvarna FC 450 2016 has a range of strengths that make it a desirable choice for motocross enthusiasts. Unfortunately, the provided data does not specify any strengths for the Husqvarna model.
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha YZ450F 2016 has been reported to have a slightly aggressive engine in the lower range, which may require some adjustment for riders who prefer a smoother power delivery. On the other hand, the Husqvarna FC 450 2016 is mentioned to be reserved for factory teams only, meaning it may not be readily available to the general public. Additionally, the Husqvarna model is described as expensive, which may limit its accessibility to some riders.
In conclusion, both the Yamaha YZ450F 2016 and the Husqvarna FC 450 2016 are high-performance motocross bikes with their own unique features and strengths. While the Yamaha offers a powerful engine and adjustable mappings, the Husqvarna's strengths are not specified in the provided data. However, it is important to consider the potential weaknesses of each model, such as the Yamaha's aggressive engine in the lower range and the limited availability and higher cost of the Husqvarna. Ultimately, riders should carefully evaluate their preferences and needs before making a decision between these two models.
Caractéristiques techniques Yamaha YZ450F 2016 par rapport à Husqvarna FC 450 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Yamaha YZ450F 2016
Le moteur de l'YZ450F est puissant et un peu agressif, mais il peut être optimisé par des cartographies. Ce qui est frappant sur l'YZ450F, c'est le bruit d'aspiration important du moteur, mais on s'y habitue rapidement. La maniabilité est également très bonne et les vitesses sont faciles à passer. Contrairement à la 250, la YZ450F GYTR est un peu plus légère et plus agréable à conduire que la 450 standard. Le châssis répond bien, fonctionne très bien et est très facile à manier. Elle convient donc également aux pilotes amateurs.
Husqvarna FC 450 2016
Comme seuls les pilotes d'usine et des journalistes triés sur le volet conduiront un jour ces motocross, cela n'a pas de sens de rédiger une conclusion. En principe, nous parlerons ici du matériel moto le plus performant et le plus rapide en tout-terrain. Chaque pièce est triée sur le volet, livrée et usinée par les meilleures entreprises. Les pilotes peuvent faire adapter leurs véhicules à 100% à leurs besoins et à leur parcours. De ce point de vue, on ne peut plus parler de faiblesses.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Yamaha YZ450F vs Husqvarna FC 450
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha YZ450F 2016 and a Husqvarna FC 450 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 450 with 93 days compared to 169 days for the Yamaha YZ450F. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 17 reviews for the Yamaha YZ450F and 6 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 450 since model year 2014. The first review for the Yamaha YZ450F was published on 10/24/2005 and now has more than 2,500 views. This compares to more than 6,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 450 published on 3/4/2015.
