BMW K 1300 R 2009 vs. KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

Loading...

Vue d’ensemble - BMW K 1300 R 2009 vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

The BMW K 1300 R 2009 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 are both naked bikes with powerful engines and similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, both bikes have the same output of 173 HP, which provides them with excellent acceleration and top speed. The BMW K 1300 R has a torque of 140 Nm, while the KTM 1290 Super Duke R has a slightly higher torque of 144 Nm. This difference in torque may result in a slightly more responsive throttle and better low-end power for the KTM.

In terms of displacement, the BMW K 1300 R has a slightly smaller engine at 1293 ccm, compared to the KTM 1290 Super Duke R's 1301 ccm. While this difference may not be significant in terms of performance, it could potentially affect the overall feel and responsiveness of the bikes.

Both bikes have similar front suspension setups, with the BMW K 1300 R featuring a strut suspension and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork. The choice of suspension setup can have an impact on the bike's handling and overall comfort. The KTM's upside-down telescopic fork is typically known for providing better performance and more precise handling.

BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

In terms of braking, both bikes have four-piston front calipers, which should provide excellent stopping power and control. The BMW K 1300 R and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R both have 17-inch front and rear tire diameters, which contribute to their stability and handling.

The wheelbase of the BMW K 1300 R is slightly longer at 1585 mm, compared to the KTM 1290 Super Duke R's 1482 mm. A longer wheelbase can contribute to stability at high speeds and in straight-line riding, while a shorter wheelbase can enhance maneuverability and agility in corners.

In terms of seat height, the BMW K 1300 R has a lower seat height at 820 mm, compared to the KTM 1290 Super Duke R's 835 mm. A lower seat height can make it easier for riders to reach the ground and provide a more comfortable riding position for shorter riders.

Both bikes have similar fuel tank capacities, with the BMW K 1300 R having a 19-liter tank and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R having an 18-liter tank. This should provide both bikes with a decent range for longer rides.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

In terms of strengths, the BMW K 1300 R has a sharp and attractive design, plenty of power, and a comfortable and relaxed ride. It also features advanced systems such as ABS, RDC, EVO, ASC, and ESA 2, which enhance safety and performance.

On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R is praised for its precise handling, traction control system, and powerful engine. These features make it a popular choice among riders who prioritize performance and agility.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW K 1300 R has been reported to have a curve settling-in period at the beginning, which may require some time for riders to adjust to its handling characteristics. On the other hand, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R is often criticized for its high price, which may make it less accessible for some riders.

Overall, both the BMW K 1300 R 2009 and the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013 are powerful and capable naked bikes. The choice between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences, budget, and intended use.

Caractéristiques techniques BMW K 1300 R 2009 par rapport à KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

BMW K 1300 R 2009
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013
Afficher tout
Identique uniquement
Différences
BMW K 1300 R 2009
BMW K 1300 R 2009
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013
KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

Suspension avant

Suspension avantSuspension avantButéeSuspension avantFourche télescopique inversée

Freins arrière

TypeTypeDisqueTypeDisque
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Fixation d’amortisseurFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier flottantFixation d’amortisseurÉtrier fixe

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison

BMW K 1300 R 2009

BMW K 1300 R 2009

On ouvre la poignée des gaz, la K pousse vers l'avant et ensuite, quand on s'accorde une petite pause sur d'autres motos, on reste tout simplement à fond sur l'accélérateur avec la K relookée et on enfonce le rapport suivant. Une vraie merveille pour les courses exigeantes.

Look affûté

beaucoup de puissance

confort

sensation de conduite détendue

système optimisé

ABS

RDC

EVO

ASC

ESA 2.

Période d'acclimatation initiale courte.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013

Avec toute la puissance et les vidéos "Beast" de KTM, ce monstre de puissance est en fait une moto 100% adaptée à la vie de tous les jours pour les randonnées ou le chemin du travail.

maniabilité précise

contrôle de traction

moteur puissant

prix élevé

Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW K 1300 R vs KTM 1290 Super Duke R

There are a few key differences between a BMW K 1300 R 2009 and a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a BMW K 1300 R with 81 days compared to 140 days for a KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW K 1300 R and 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW K 1300 R was published on 10/9/2008 and now has more than 20,400 views. This compares to more than 4,900 views for the first review on KTM 1290 Super Duke R published on 11/8/2012.

Prix BMW K 1300 R

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Prix KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Année modèle
Prix moyens actuels du marché

Comparaisons alternatives

Partenaire 1000PS

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen