Husqvarna FC 250 2016 vs. Husqvarna FE 250 2016
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Husqvarna FE 250 2016
Vue d’ensemble - Husqvarna FC 250 2016 vs Husqvarna FE 250 2016
The Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 250 2016 are both powerful motocross bikes, but they have some key differences.
In terms of engine specifications, both bikes have the same bore and stroke measurements of 78mm and 52.3mm respectively. However, the FC 250 has a higher compression ratio of 13.9 compared to the FE 250's compression ratio of 12.8. This means that the FC 250 has a higher power output and may be more suitable for experienced riders who want a more aggressive ride.
Another difference between the two bikes is the starter mechanism. The FC 250 has an electric starter, making it easier to start the bike with the push of a button. On the other hand, the FE 250 has a kick starter, which may require more effort to start the bike. This could be a disadvantage for riders who prefer the convenience of an electric starter.
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Both bikes have a 4-stroke engine and a chain transmission. They also share the same suspension setup, with upside-down telescopic forks in the front and WP shock mounts in the rear. The chassis of both bikes is made of steel and has a central tube frame type.
In terms of dimensions and weights, there are some slight variations. The FC 250 has a slightly narrower front tire width of 80mm compared to the FE 250's 90mm. The rear tire width of the FC 250 is 100mm, while the FE 250 has a wider rear tire width of 120mm. The FC 250 has a larger front tire diameter of 21 inches, while the FE 250 has a smaller front tire diameter of 18 inches. The wheelbase of the FC 250 is slightly longer at 1495mm compared to the FE 250's 1482mm. The seat height of the FC 250 is also higher at 992mm compared to the FE 250's 970mm.
In terms of weight, the FC 250 is slightly lighter with a dry weight of 104.1kg compared to the FE 250's 107.5kg. The FC 250 also has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 7.5 liters, while the FE 250 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 9.5 liters.
Husqvarna FE 250 2016
In terms of strengths, the FC 250 is known for its performance and power, making it a popular choice for professional riders and factory teams. On the other hand, the FE 250 is considered to be very easy to ride and is often recommended for beginners. It offers a more relaxed ride and is less intimidating for novice riders.
However, the FC 250 is reserved for factory teams only, which means it may not be easily accessible to the general public. It is also more expensive compared to the FE 250. On the other hand, the FE 250 may struggle on endless steep rides and may not have the same level of power and performance as the FC 250.
In conclusion, the Husqvarna FC 250 2016 is a high-performance motocross bike suitable for experienced riders, while the Husqvarna FE 250 2016 is a more beginner-friendly bike with a relaxed ride. Both bikes have their own strengths and weaknesses, so it ultimately depends on the rider's skill level and preferences.
Caractéristiques techniques Husqvarna FC 250 2016 par rapport à Husqvarna FE 250 2016
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Husqvarna FC 250 2016
Comme seuls les pilotes d'usine et des journalistes triés sur le volet conduiront un jour ces motocross, cela n'a pas de sens de rédiger une conclusion. En principe, nous parlerons ici du matériel moto le plus performant et le plus rapide en tout-terrain. Chaque pièce est triée sur le volet, livrée et usinée par les meilleures entreprises. Les pilotes peuvent faire adapter leurs véhicules à 100% à leurs besoins et à leur parcours. De ce point de vue, on ne peut plus parler de faiblesses.
Husqvarna FE 250 2016
Le quatre-temps d'entrée de gamme a également gagné en puissance. Malgré tout, la 250 reste facile à piloter, presque à l'épreuve des bêtes. Secrètement, c'est ma préférée parmi les nouveaux modèles 2017. Elle allie une maniabilité simple à un moteur docile mais puissant.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché Husqvarna FC 250 vs Husqvarna FE 250
There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FC 250 2016 and a Husqvarna FE 250 2016. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna FC 250 with 34 days compared to 78 days for a Husqvarna FE 250. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 250 and 7 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 250 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna FC 250 was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 6,800 views. This compares to more than 48,700 views for the first review on Husqvarna FE 250 published on 3/27/2015.
