BMW R 1200 GS 2012 vs. Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
BMW R 1200 GS 2012
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
Vue d’ensemble - BMW R 1200 GS 2012 vs Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
which can make it feel slightly top-heavy in certain situations; wind protection could be improved; seat may not be as comfortable for longer rides.
In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 has a Boxer engine with a bore of 101 mm and a stroke of 73 mm. It produces 110 HP of power and 120 Nm of torque. The transmission is a prop shaft and it has 2 cylinders with a displacement of 1170 ccm. On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has an in-line engine with a bore of 85 mm and a stroke of 71.4 mm. It produces 137 HP of power and 121 Nm of torque. The transmission is also a prop shaft, but it has 3 cylinders with a displacement of 1215 ccm.
In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 has a front suspension that is a strut with preload adjustment, while the rear suspension also has preload adjustment. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013, on the other hand, has a front suspension that is a telescopic fork with preload adjustment, and the rear suspension also has preload adjustment.
BMW R 1200 GS 2012
In terms of chassis, the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 has a load-bearing engine frame type, while the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a tubular frame type.
In terms of brakes, both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front.
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 has a rear tire width of 110 mm, a wheelbase of 1507 mm, a seat height of 850 mm, and a fuel tank capacity of 20 l. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a rear tire width of 150 mm, a wheelbase of 1530 mm, a seat height of 840 mm, and a fuel tank capacity of 20 l.
Overall, the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 offers optimal wind protection, a comfortable seat, and a good posture with positive ergonomics. Its weather robustness and quiet chassis make it a reliable choice for various riding conditions. However, some riders may find the seat height a little too low.
On the other hand, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 offers light handling and agility, making it a fun and easy bike to ride. It excels in direction changes and the brakes function flawlessly. The upright seating position adds to the overall comfort. However, the top-heavy feeling due to a higher center of gravity, lack of wind protection, and potentially less comfortable seat for longer rides may be considered as weaknesses.
Caractéristiques techniques BMW R 1200 GS 2012 par rapport à Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
Avantages et inconvénients en comparaison
BMW R 1200 GS 2012
Soit c'était un coup de chance, soit les meilleurs concepteurs étaient à l'œuvre - guidon, géométrie, siège, angle du genou, repose-pieds - tout cela convient vraiment bien à la majorité des Européens centraux. Globalement, il n'y a toujours pas de moto qui puisse tuer la GS.
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
La Triumph Tiger Explorer XC est une moto imposante qui signale dès l'arrêt qu'elle ne veut pas forcément être utilisée abusivement comme machine d'entrée de gamme. Le carénage imposant s'accorde donc très bien avec le caractère global de cette moto masculine britannique.
Comparaison des prix Prix moyen du marché BMW R 1200 GS vs Triumph Tiger Explorer XC
There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 GS 2012 and a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 23. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC with 52 days compared to 58 days for the BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS and 5 reviews for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC since model year 2013. The first review for the BMW R 1200 GS was published on 1/20/2004 and now has more than 19,100 views. This compares to more than 15,000 views for the first review on Triumph Tiger Explorer XC published on 9/3/2012.
