BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs Kawasaki Z900 2021

The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the Kawasaki Z900 2021 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations, and four cylinders. However, there are several differences between the two models in terms of specifications, performance, and features.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 boasts a higher output with 160 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2021's 125.4 HP. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of sheer performance and acceleration. The torque figures also favor the BMW, with 112 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. The BMW's larger displacement of 999 ccm also contributes to its higher power output.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension, providing a comfortable and stable ride. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has the advantage of a twin-tube aluminum frame, which is known for its lightweight and rigid characteristics. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 features a steel frame with a double cradle design, which may provide a different feel and handling.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes with four pistons in the front. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, which can provide better braking performance and control compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2021's petal technology.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers dynamic suspension, which can enhance the bike's handling and stability. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 offers a more comprehensive set of assistance systems, including ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. These features can enhance the overall safety and performance of the bike.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly higher at 814 mm compared to the Z900's 795 mm. Additionally, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly lower kerb weight of 207 kg compared to the Z900's 210 kg.

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, and very good electronic helpers. It also provides a terrific price/performance ratio and is fast and comfortable on both racetracks and country roads. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 boasts a powerful four-cylinder engine, intuitive handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and its DDC (dynamic suspension) may be on the "hard" side overall. The seat is relatively high, which may not be ideal for shorter riders, and the design is subjective and a matter of personal taste. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2021 lacks the option for a quickshifter and some competitors offer more advanced electronic systems with a 6-axis IMU (inertial measurement unit).

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the Kawasaki Z900 2021 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a higher power output and sportier characteristics, while the Kawasaki provides good value for money and a more comprehensive set of rider assistance systems. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2014 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Kawasaki Z900 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter41 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth820 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, except for the lack of a quickshifter option.

powerful four-cylinder

intuitive handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

No quickshifter option

competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically ahead.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a Kawasaki Z900 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 12% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2021 there are less BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 33. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 107 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG