Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017 vs. Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Loading...

Overview - Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017 vs Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017

Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Technical Specifications Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017 compared to Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Piaggio Zip 50 2T 2017
Beeline Veloce 50 2014

Engine and Drive Train

StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeAutomaticTransmission TypeVariomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingAir
DisplacementDisplacement49 ccmDisplacement49 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDrum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width100 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter10 inchFront tyre diameter12 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter10 inchRear tyre diameter12 inch
LengthLength1,700 mmLength1,850 mm
WidthWidth680 mmWidth670 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,170 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.3 lFuel Tank Capacity4.8 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG