Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

The Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line configurations. However, there are notable differences in their technical specifications.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a significant advantage with 160 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012's 135 HP. The BMW also has a slightly higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Triumph's 111 Nm. This higher power and torque output of the BMW translates to better acceleration and overall performance.

The number of cylinders also differs between the two bikes, with the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 having 3 cylinders and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 having 4 cylinders. This additional cylinder in the BMW contributes to its higher power output.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Both bikes have a similar displacement, with the Triumph at 1050 ccm and the BMW at 999 ccm. This means that the BMW achieves its higher power output with a smaller engine size, indicating a more efficient design.

In terms of suspension, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. The upside-down design of the BMW's front suspension provides better stability and handling, especially during aggressive riding.

Both bikes have double disk front brakes with four pistons, but the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 also features radial, monoblock technology. This technology enhances the braking performance and provides a more precise and responsive feel.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are minor differences between the two bikes. The BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1439 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012's 1435 mm. The seat height of the BMW is also slightly lower at 814 mm compared to the Triumph's 825 mm. Both bikes have the same fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 requires wider radii and can be somewhat complicated to ride in turns. It also has weaknesses in comfort. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and its Dynamic Damping Control (DDC) system, while effective, can still be on the "hard" side overall. The seat of the BMW is relatively high, and its design is subjective and a matter of personal taste.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers superior power and performance with its higher horsepower and torque, as well as a more efficient engine design. It also has a sportier chassis and better electronic helpers. However, the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 has a flawless racing chassis, stable brakes, and an inspiring look. Ultimately, the choice between the two bikes will depend on individual preferences and priorities.