Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021 vs. BMW R nineT 2018
Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021
BMW R nineT 2018
Overview - Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021 vs BMW R nineT 2018
The Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021 and the BMW R nineT 2018 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Sportster S RH1250S has a more powerful engine with 122 HP compared to the R nineT's 110 HP. The Sportster S also has a higher torque of 125 Nm compared to the R nineT's 116 Nm. This means that the Sportster S may offer better acceleration and overall performance.
Both bikes have a 2-cylinder engine and use fuel injection systems. The Sportster S has a displacement of 1252 cc, while the R nineT has a displacement of 1170 cc. This means that the Sportster S has a slightly larger engine, which may contribute to its higher power output.
Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021
In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. However, the Sportster S has a swing arm suspension at the rear, while the R nineT has a Paralever suspension. Both bikes have monoshock absorbers at the rear.
In terms of brakes, the Sportster S has a single disc front brake with a diameter of 320 mm and four pistons. It also features radial and monoblock technology, which may contribute to better braking performance. On the other hand, the R nineT has double disc front brakes with the same diameter and four pistons, but without the radial technology.
Both bikes have ABS as part of their advanced rider assistance systems. However, the Sportster S also offers additional features such as riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, cruise control, and traction control. The R nineT only has ABS.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Sportster S has a wider front tire (160 mm) compared to the R nineT (120 mm). The Sportster S also has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 11.8 liters, while the R nineT has a larger capacity of 18 liters. The Sportster S has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the R nineT's 1487 mm. The seat height of the Sportster S is lower at 755 mm, while the R nineT has a higher seat height of 803 mm. The Sportster S also weighs slightly more at 228 kg compared to the R nineT's 222 kg.
BMW R nineT 2018
In terms of strengths, the Sportster S has a powerful and refined engine, excellent brakes for a single-disc system, and a full electronics package with advanced features such as cornering ABS and lean angle-dependent traction control. On the other hand, the R nineT has a boxer engine that is full of character, with powerful low-end torque and a comfortable seating position. The R nineT also has an extensive equipment list and a large accessories market, allowing for customization. Additionally, the R nineT has a cool look.
In terms of weaknesses, the Sportster S has a chassis that is considered to be really hard, which may affect the overall comfort and handling. The wide front tire of the Sportster S also contributes to a somewhat unwilling turn-in behavior. On the other hand, the R nineT has a footrest position that may be uncomfortable when maneuvering and the passenger ride comfort may not be as good. Additionally, the R nineT may have a higher price compared to the Sportster S.
Overall, both the Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021 and the BMW R nineT 2018 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Sportster S offers a more powerful engine and a full electronics package, while the R nineT has a characterful engine and an extensive equipment list. The choice between the two models ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021 compared to BMW R nineT 2018
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021
The Sportster S returns to the tradition of this model series - yes, it really used to be about sport! That's why the latest American creation, with its 122 hp and 125 Nm of torque, doesn't want to be a cruiser, but instead is almost classless in its pursuit of customers. What is on offer is a wonderful poser bike that is surprisingly easy to ride. The single-disc brake at the front works well and the fat 160 front tyre steers better than you would expect. Only the hard suspension makes the rider suffer on longer distances - which of course doesn't matter at all in front of the ice cream parlour. Electronics and safety are top-notch, which mitigates the tidy price for true fans.
BMW R nineT 2018
What more can be said about the BMW R nineT? Since its release in 2014, it has been a real perennial favourite in the customising scene and also at BMW itself. Its ingredients, however, are of very high quality and explain why the result is so coherent. The boxer engine, full of character, is a real joy every time you pull the throttle and, thanks to the wonderful sound, it never gets boring in the long run. Despite the relatively high weight, the BMW is pleasant to ride thanks to the high-quality chassis and finds a balanced mixture between cruiser and sporty naked bike. The look is of course a matter of taste, but the sales figures suggest that BMW must have done something right. And even if you don't like the standard look, accessories are a dime a dozen.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S vs BMW R nineT
There are a few key differences between a Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S 2021 and a BMW R nineT 2018. It takes less time to sell a Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S with 73 days compared to 115 days for a BMW R nineT. Since model year 2021 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S and 57 reviews for the BMW R nineT since model year 2014. The first review for the Harley-Davidson Sportster S RH1250S was published on 7/13/2021 and now has more than 78,300 views. This compares to more than 17,000 views for the first review on BMW R nineT published on 10/17/2013.