Kawasaki Z 800 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 800 2013 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have an inline engine type. However, the Yamaha MT-09 has a slightly higher engine power of 115 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 113 HP. The torque is also higher in the Yamaha MT-09 with 87.5 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 83 Nm. The Yamaha MT-09 has three cylinders while the Kawasaki Z 800 has four. The displacement is also higher in the Yamaha MT-09 with 847 ccm compared to the Kawasaki Z 800's 806 ccm.

In terms of suspension, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has an upside-down telescopic fork for the front suspension, while the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a telescopic fork.

In terms of chassis, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has a steel frame, while the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has an aluminum frame. The frame type of the Kawasaki Z 800 is a double cradle, while the Yamaha MT-09 has a twin tube frame type.

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front. The front tire width and diameter are the same for both bikes, with a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The rear tire width and diameter are also the same for both bikes, with a width of 180 mm and a diameter of 17 inches.

The wheelbase of the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 is slightly longer at 1445 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2016's 1440 mm. The seat height of the Kawasaki Z 800 is higher at 834 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 815 mm. The kerb weight of the Kawasaki Z 800 is heavier at 229 kg compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 188 kg. The fuel tank capacity of the Kawasaki Z 800 is larger at 17 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 14 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has an eye-catching, chunky look. It also has confident acceleration and a relaxed geometry, making it comfortable for long rides. The powerful brakes of the Kawasaki Z 800 provide excellent stopping power.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant. It also has three power modes, allowing the rider to adjust the performance according to their preference. The fully adjustable chassis of the Yamaha MT-09 provides a customizable riding experience. The quickshifter as standard is a convenient feature, and the sporty upright seating position adds to the bike's agility. The Yamaha MT-09 also has good brakes and aggressive looks, making it visually appealing. The inclusion of traction control enhances safety.

In terms of weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z 800 2013 has limited freedom of movement for the legs, which may affect rider comfort on long rides.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2016 has a saddle that is a little too hard for long tours, which may cause discomfort during extended rides. Additionally, the license plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one, which may result in more dirt and water splashing onto the rider and the bike.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 800 2013 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore71 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power113 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,200 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque83 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.9 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement806 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,050 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height834 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight229 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Overall, the Z800 delivered a sensational performance. Considering the fact that nothing was changed or optimised on the vehicle apart from the Remus rear silencer, a super final result.

Eye-catching, chunky look

confident acceleration

relaxed geometry

powerful brakes

Limited freedom of movement for the legs.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 800 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z 800 2013 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2016 is about 15% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are less Kawasaki Z 800 2013 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z 800 with 56 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 800 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki Z 800 was published on 9/6/2012 and now has more than 8,100 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Kawasaki Z 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG