Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs. Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 have inline engines. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 has a more powerful engine with 149 HP compared to the Triumph Street Triple 765 R's 118 HP. The Suzuki also has a higher torque of 106 Nm compared to the Triumph's 77 Nm. Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 has adjustable compression, preload, and rebound settings for both the front and rear suspension, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 R has the same adjustments plus compression settings for the rear suspension.

Both bikes have aluminum frames with twin tube designs. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 has double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 310 mm and four pistons, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 R has the same specifications but with the addition of radial technology and monoblock pistons.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes have ABS. However, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R also has riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 has a rear tire width of 190 mm and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, while the Triumph Street Triple 765 R has a rear tire width of 180 mm. The Suzuki has a longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the Triumph's 1410 mm. The seat height of the Suzuki is 815 mm, while the Triumph's seat height is slightly higher at 825 mm. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters, with the Triumph Street Triple 765 R having a slightly larger capacity of 17.4 liters.

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a powerful engine, good braking control, a stable and sensitive chassis, a comfortable seating position, and a relatively low price. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 has a powerful powertrain, decent torque, a great sound, super brakes, a sufficiently comfortable ride, a color TFT display, the ability to switch off ABS, standard traction control, a very light weight, and an independent look.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 has a front end that some may consider too good-looking and a throttle response in the lower rev range that can be too aggressive. The Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 has a slightly rougher throttle response and is noticeably different from the top model RS.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a more powerful engine and good value for money, while the Triumph provides a powerful powertrain, advanced rider assistance systems, and a unique look. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 compared to Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016
Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power149 HPEngine power118 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque106 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,400 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel115 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel134 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,085 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017

The golden mean of the three Street Triple Schwesetern S, R and RS inspires with balanced riding performance - not too comfortable but far enough away from the top model RS. The engine characteristics aim for a bulbous middle in the rev range and exude a lot of charisma - among other things because of the unique sound. In terms of handling, there is hardly anything better; the Street Triple is the lightest in its class. For smaller riders, there is a version with a low seat height, and for A2 licence holders, there is a variant with 95 hp that can easily be throttled down to 48 hp.

powerful powertrain

decent torque

great sound

super brakes

sufficiently comfortable

colour TFT display

ABS can be switched off

traction control standard

very light

independent look

Slightly rougher throttle response

noticeable distance to the top model RS

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S1000 vs Triumph Street Triple 765 R

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 and a Triumph Street Triple 765 R 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple 765 R with 86 days compared to 109 days for the Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 and 15 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 765 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 was published on 9/27/2014 and now has more than 17,100 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 765 R published on 1/10/2017.

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 765 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG