BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, displacements, and suspension systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slight advantage with 160 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015's 149 HP. This extra power gives the BMW a more aggressive and sporty feel, making it ideal for those who enjoy high-performance riding. The BMW also has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 106 Nm, providing better acceleration and responsiveness.

Both bikes have four cylinders and a displacement of 999 ccm, ensuring a smooth and powerful ride. The suspension systems on both models consist of upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arms with monoshock absorbers at the rear. This setup allows for excellent handling and stability, making them suitable for both city riding and long-distance journeys.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes with four pistons at the front and radial technology. This ensures strong and reliable stopping power, giving riders confidence in their ability to control the bike. However, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 has an advantage with the inclusion of ABS, providing an extra layer of safety and preventing wheel lock-up during sudden braking.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2014's 1439 mm. This may result in slightly different handling characteristics, with the Suzuki potentially offering more stability at higher speeds. Both bikes have a seat height of around 815 mm, making them suitable for riders of various heights.

In terms of weight, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is slightly lighter at 207 kg compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015's 209 kg. This weight difference may not be significant, but it could potentially affect the bike's agility and maneuverability.

In terms of rider assistance systems, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 comes equipped with dynamic suspension, which helps optimize the bike's performance based on the riding conditions. This advanced system ensures a comfortable and controlled ride, especially on uneven surfaces. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 only has ABS as its rider assistance system, providing basic safety features.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers a sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, excellent electronic helpers, and a terrific price/performance ratio. It is fast and comfortable on both racetracks and country roads. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015, on the other hand, boasts a legendary Suzuki engine with a sharp sound, rev-happy nature, pleasing design, strong brakes, and a taut chassis. It also does not compromise on performance.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and a seat that is relatively high, which may not be suitable for shorter riders. It also tempts riders to overdrive due to its power and performance. The design of the BMW is subjective and may not appeal to everyone's taste. The Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015, on the other hand, is based on an older platform and may not offer the same level of performance in the higher rev range. It may also experience load change issues.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 are capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more power and advanced rider assistance systems, while the Suzuki provides a legendary engine and a pleasing design. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2014 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)209 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015

The GSX-S1000 is an honest motorbike in terms of performance and handling. You get even more than stated on paper, but you have to get the four-in-line up to speed first. As a rider, you have the feeling that you are still in command, even if the GSX-S is no longer completely without standard riding assistance systems - which work extremely well. Contact with the road feels direct, the dynamics are precise and transparent. Not only in terms of design can this naked bike give pleasure for many years to come, the somewhat outdated basis is quickly forgotten.

Legendary Suzuki engine

sharp sound

rev-happy

harmonious tuning

pleasing design

strong brakes

taut chassis

no performance cheating.

Old base

weak performance in the rev range

load change

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Suzuki GSX-S1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 30% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2015 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 86 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 9/27/2014.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH