BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2013

BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Overview - BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013 vs Yamaha MT-09 2013

BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2013

BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Show all

Same only

Differences

BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine type	Engine type	Boxer	Engine type	In line
Bore	Bore	101 mm	Bore	78 mm
Stroke	Stroke	73 mm	Stroke	59.1 mm
Engine power	Engine power	110 HP	Engine power	115 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	7,750 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	10,000 rpm
Torque	Torque	119 Nm	Torque	87.5 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	6,000 rpm	Rpm at Torque	8,500 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12	Compression Ratio	11.5
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Toughened, Dry	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Prop shaft	Transmission	Chain
Number of gears	Number of gears	6	Number of gears	6
Cylinders	Cylinders	2	Cylinders	3
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	1,170 ccm	Displacement	847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Telelever	Front suspension	Telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame type	Frame type	Load-bearing engine	Frame type	Twin Tube

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	180 mm	Rear tyre width	180 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	55 %	Rear tyre height	55 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Length	Length	2,145 mm	Length	2,075 mm
Width	Width	906 mm	Width	815 mm
Height	Height	1,285 mm	Height	1,135 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	800 mm	Seat Height	815 mm
Kerb Weight	Kerb Weight	223 kg	Kerb Weight	188 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	18 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	14 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 R Classic 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

Alternative Comparisons

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2022

VS.

Yamaha Tracer 900 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2020

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Yamaha MT-10 2019 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2019

VS.

Harley-Davidson Softail Breakout 114 FXBRS 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2014 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2018

VS.

BMW R 1250 RS 2021 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 2021 vs
BMW F 900 R 2022

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 2020 vs
Kawasaki Z900RS 2020

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Aprilia Shiver 900 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

VS.

Kawasaki Z900 2022 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2022

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Suzuki GSX-S 750 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2020

VS.

Triumph Speed Triple S 2020 vs
Yamaha MT-09 2021

Ad

Built for Adventure.

The TKC70 Rocks is built for the long haul and rocky trail. 

Details

VS.

Yamaha MT-09 2019 vs
BMW F 900 R 2020