Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs. Honda NC700S 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Honda NC700S 2013

Honda NC700S 2013

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs Honda NC700S 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Honda NC700S 2013

Honda NC700S 2013

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2016 compared to Honda NC700S 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2016
Honda NC700S 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore73 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power48 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque62 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio10.7
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement670 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Tubular

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,195 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth760 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,130 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,525 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14.1 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Honda NC700S 2013

Honda NC700S 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Honda NC700S

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda NC700S

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH