Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 vs Yamaha MT-09 2013

The Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 has a slight advantage with 115 HP compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011's 106 HP. This extra power can provide a more exhilarating ride and quicker acceleration.

Similarly, the torque of the Yamaha MT-09 2013 is higher at 87.5 Nm compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011's 82 Nm. This increased torque can result in better low-end power and improved overall performance.

The engine configuration also differs between the two models. The Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 has a 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 779 ccm, while the Yamaha MT-09 2013 features a 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847 ccm. The 3-cylinder engine of the MT-09 is known for its smooth power delivery and distinctive sound.

In terms of suspension, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 is equipped with an Upside-Down telescopic fork, while the Yamaha MT-09 2013 features a telescopic fork. Both suspension setups provide a comfortable ride and good handling, but the MT-09's telescopic fork may offer slightly better feedback and responsiveness.

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

The chassis of the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 is a Deltabox frame, which provides stability and versatility. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 features a Twin Tube frame, which offers a good balance between rigidity and flexibility. Both frames contribute to the overall stability and handling of the bikes.

In terms of braking, both models have double disk brakes at the front, ensuring reliable stopping power. This feature enhances safety and control while riding.

The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are quite similar, with both having a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm. The front and rear tire diameters are also the same at 17 inches. However, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1460 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 2013's 1440 mm. Both bikes have a seat height of 815 mm, providing a comfortable riding position for most riders.

In terms of weight, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 is lighter with a kerb weight of 188 kg, compared to the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011's 211 kg. This lighter weight can contribute to better maneuverability and agility.

The fuel tank capacity of the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 is 17 liters, while the Yamaha MT-09 2013 has a slightly smaller tank capacity of 14 liters. This means that the FZ-8N may offer a longer range before needing to refuel.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

When it comes to strengths, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 is known for its stability and universal chassis, allowing for a variety of riding styles. Additionally, it offers a large variety of accessories to customize the bike according to individual preferences. The acceptable performance of the FZ-8N ensures an enjoyable riding experience.

On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 stands out for its reasonable price and powerful engine. The combination of affordability and performance makes it an attractive option for riders looking for a thrilling ride without breaking the bank.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 has a footrest detent insert that sets too early, resulting in unsteadiness in the chassis and scraping on the ground. The exhaust design of the FZ-8N is also considered unattractive. Additionally, some riders find the FZ-8N to be a bit cumbersome.

The Yamaha MT-09 2013, on the other hand, has a hard chassis that may compromise comfort on rough roads. It is also known for its relatively high fuel consumption, which can be a drawback for riders looking for a more fuel-efficient option.

In conclusion, the Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 and the Yamaha MT-09 2013 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths. The FZ-8N offers stability, versatility, and a variety of accessories, while the MT-09 provides a powerful engine at an affordable price. However, it is important for riders to consider their individual preferences and riding needs when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011
Yamaha MT-09 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore68 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke53.6 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque82 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement779 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeDeltaboxFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight211 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

Yamaha FZ-8N 2011

But as in life, you can't demonise the "approximate 3/4 litre" concept of the FZ-8 by quickly leafing through the data sheets. That would be a shame, because the 8 has given us a lot of pleasure in the 3,200 kilometres we have covered so far. Contrary to the facts, the 800 is probably the best choice for the average ambitious rider.

Stable and stable

chassis relatively universal

large variety of accessories

acceptable performance

Footrest detent insert sets too early and brings unsteadiness into the chassis - as well as scraping on the ground

ugly exhaust

a bit cumbersome

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The start is frightening - abandonment of 1st gear.

Reasonable price

powerful engine

Hard chassis

high consumption

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha FZ-8N vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha FZ-8N 2011 and a Yamaha MT-09 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 13. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 52 days compared to 70 days for the Yamaha FZ-8N. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Yamaha FZ-8N and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Yamaha FZ-8N was published on 1/27/2010 and now has more than 8,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Yamaha FZ-8N

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH