Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have an inline engine with a displacement of 1050cc and liquid cooling. They also have the same number of cylinders and produce similar torque. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

One of the main differences is in the front suspension. The Speed Triple 1050 2011 is equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork from Showa, while the Speed Triple R 2012 has a telescopic fork from Öhlins. Both suspensions offer compression and rebound adjustment, but the Öhlins fork on the Speed Triple R 2012 also has preload adjustment. This gives the Speed Triple R 2012 a more precise and customizable suspension setup.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Another difference is in the braking system. Both models have four-piston front brakes with radial technology, but the Speed Triple R 2012 has monoblock calipers, which provide even more braking power and stability. This gives the Speed Triple R 2012 an advantage in terms of braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both models have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also have the same wheelbase and fuel tank capacity. However, the Speed Triple R 2012 has a slightly lower seat height, which may be more comfortable for shorter riders.

When it comes to strengths, the Speed Triple 1050 2011 is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the Speed Triple R 2012 is known for its flawless racing chassis, precise handling, inspiring looks, great engine, and stable brakes.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

In terms of weaknesses, the Speed Triple 1050 2011 is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disrupt the connection between the rider and the machine. The Speed Triple R 2012, on the other hand, requires wider radii in turns and may be somewhat complicated to ride in tight corners. It also has some weaknesses in terms of comfort.

Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Triumph Speed Triple R 2012 are powerful and capable naked bikes. The Speed Triple R 2012 offers some upgrades in terms of suspension, braking, and aesthetics, but it also comes with a higher price tag. Riders looking for a more precise and race-inspired experience may prefer the Speed Triple R 2012, while those seeking a more affordable option with a focus on stability may opt for the Speed Triple 1050 2011.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque110 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandShowaBrandÖhlins
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,086 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth728 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

Triumph Speed Triple R 2012

The R rides as precisely and calmly as never before. It is guaranteed to keep its nerve even when the rider may have long since thrown it away. The disadvantage of the compact powerhouse is that the radii have to be a little wider and the course a little faster so that the true Queen of England can also play the 4 aces up her sleeve.

Flawless racing chassis

very precise

relatively stable

inspiring looks

great engine

stable brakes

Requires wide radii

Somewhat complicated to ride in turns

Weaknesses in comfort

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Triumph Speed Triple R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Triumph Speed Triple R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 6. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 78 days for a Triumph Speed Triple R. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple R since model year 2012. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 11,100 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple R published on 10/24/2011.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH