Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Overview - Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 vs BMW R 1200 GS 2016
The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are both enduro motorcycles that offer a combination of on-road and off-road capabilities. While they share some similarities in terms of specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 is equipped with an in-line three-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1215cc. It produces 137 horsepower and 121 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 features a boxer twin-cylinder engine with a displacement of 1170cc. It has a slightly lower power output of 125 horsepower and the same torque as the Triumph at 125 Nm.
In terms of suspension, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 comes with a telescopic fork front suspension with preload adjustment, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a strut front suspension with preload adjustment. Both bikes offer similar rear suspension setups with preload adjustment.
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
In terms of chassis, both motorcycles feature a steel frame. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a tubular frame, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a twin tube, load-bearing engine frame.
When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a flawless functioning of the brakes, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has very sharp brakes that may take some getting used to.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire width of 150mm, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has the same front tire diameter but a slightly wider rear tire width of 170mm. The wheelbase of the Triumph is 1530mm, while the BMW has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1507mm. The seat height of the Triumph is 840mm, while the BMW has a slightly higher seat height of 850mm. The kerb weight of the Triumph is 267kg, while the BMW is lighter at 238kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
In terms of strengths, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 is praised for its light handling, agility, and fun-to-ride nature. It also offers easy direction changes and has a comfortable upright seating position. On the other hand, the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 is known for its powerful engine, low fuel consumption, and comfortable seating position. It also has a high reputation in the motorcycle community and can be used off-road.
However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 does not have a particularly low center of gravity, which may affect its stability in certain situations. The BMW R 1200 GS 2016 has a long and expensive surcharge side, which may be a drawback for some riders. Additionally, the Telelever front suspension on the BMW may take some getting used to, and the sharpness of the brakes can be a bit overwhelming.
In conclusion, the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2016 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Triumph offers light handling and agility, while the BMW provides a powerful engine and a comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 compared to BMW R 1200 GS 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013
The Triumph Tiger Explorer XC is a stately motorbike that already signals when stationary that it does not necessarily want to be abused as an entry-level machine. The bulky fairing therefore fits very well with the overall character of the British men's motorbike.
BMW R 1200 GS 2016
A GS is at home almost anywhere - but only to a limited extent on the racetrack. It's a pleasure to feel the power of the partially water-cooled boxer twin cylinder on the exit of the bend - 125 hp only seems much weaker on paper than 150 or even 160 hp on the competition. With 125 Newton metres of torque, the acceleration from the bottom is superb anyway and the GS, at 238 kilos ready to ride, does not carry too much flab despite its bulky appearance. In very tight corners, the low centre of gravity also has a positive effect - the BMW R 1200 GS is very hard to crack! Even the front telelever suspension, which suppresses the front wheel's tendency to sink in under braking, fits perfectly into the GS's overall package and only slightly detracts from its sporty character.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger Explorer XC vs BMW R 1200 GS
There are a few key differences between a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC 2013 and a BMW R 1200 GS 2016. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger Explorer XC with 52 days compared to 70 days for a BMW R 1200 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC and 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Tiger Explorer XC was published on 9/3/2012 and now has more than 15,000 views. This compares to more than 19,100 views for the first review on BMW R 1200 GS published on 1/20/2004.
