BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, displacements, and suspension systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a slight advantage with 160 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 149 HP. The BMW also has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 106 Nm. This means that the BMW may offer slightly better acceleration and top speed.

Both bikes have four cylinders and a displacement of 999ccm, providing a good balance between power and fuel efficiency.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. This ensures a smooth and comfortable ride for both models.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin tube design, providing strength and stability. This allows for precise handling and control.

Both bikes have double disk brakes in the front with four pistons and radial technology, ensuring powerful and reliable braking performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, there are some minor differences between the two models. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439mm compared to the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016's 1460mm. The seat height is also slightly different, with the BMW at 814mm and the Suzuki at 815mm. The kerb weight with ABS is slightly higher for the Suzuki at 209kg compared to the BMW's 207kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters.

Moving on to the strengths of each model, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, as well as its powerful braking system. Additionally, it offers a comfortable seating position for the rider.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is also praised for its powerful engine and good braking control. It is also noted for its stable and sensitive chassis, providing excellent handling and control. Furthermore, the Suzuki is relatively more affordable compared to the BMW.

However, there are also some weaknesses to consider. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 is criticized for its expensive optional extras, which may make it less accessible for some riders. Additionally, the bike has a hard chassis, which may result in a slightly less comfortable ride.

On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 is noted for its front end, which some riders feel looks too good and may not match the overall design of the bike. It is also mentioned that the throttle response in the lower rev range can be overly sensitive, which may require some adjustment in riding style.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016 are powerful and capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a powerful engine and braking system, while the Suzuki provides a stable chassis and a relatively lower price. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)209 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016

Some might be surprised that after waiting so long, Suzuki did not launch the ultimate, uncompromising power naked bike. Instead, the Suzuki GSX-S 1000 with its 149 hp seems almost too well-behaved. But once you ride it on the race track, you quickly realise that the engine is far more powerful in real life and that the rest of the performance of the chassis and braking system is also impressive. In return, it also offers a large portion of everyday and practical suitability - not bad ingredients when you have to cover everything from everyday to race track with a single bike.

Powerful engine

good braking control

stable and sensitive chassis

comfortable seating position

relatively low price.

Front end looks too good

toxic throttle response in the lower rev range

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Suzuki GSX-S1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 32% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 380 USD in one year and 1,940 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 90 USD and 1,330 USD for a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2016. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 109 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 9/27/2014.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG