Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012 vs. Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012 compared to Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Yamaha WR 125 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	54 mm	Bore	52 mm
Stroke	Stroke	54.5 mm	Stroke	58.6 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	8.8	Compression Ratio	11.2
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	124 ccm	Displacement	124.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	110 mm	Front tyre width	80 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	150 mm	Rear tyre width	110 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	60 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,470 mm	Wheelbase	1,430 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	870 mm	Seat Height	930 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	113.5 kg	Dry Weight	133 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l