Husqvarna FE 501 2016 vs. Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna FE 501 2016 vs Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

The Husqvarna FE 501 2016 and the Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017 are both enduro motorcycles with similar features but also some notable differences.

In terms of the engine and drive train, the FE 501 has a bore of 95 mm and a stroke of 72 mm, while the 701 Enduro has a larger bore of 102 mm and a stroke of 84.5 mm. The FE 501 has a kick starter, whereas the 701 Enduro has an electric starter. Both bikes have a chain transmission and a single cylinder engine, but the FE 501 has a displacement of 510.4 ccm, while the 701 Enduro has a larger displacement of 690 ccm.

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

When it comes to suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks with WP brand. The rear suspension also features WP brand. However, the FE 501 has a steel frame, while the 701 Enduro has a chromium-molybdenum frame, which is known for its durability and strength. The FE 501 has a central tube frame type, while the 701 Enduro has a tubular frame type.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a 21-inch front tire diameter and an 18-inch rear tire diameter. The wheelbase of the FE 501 is 1482 mm, while the 701 Enduro has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1504 mm. The seat height of the FE 501 is 970 mm, which is higher than the 910 mm seat height of the 701 Enduro. The fuel tank capacity of the FE 501 is 9 liters, while the 701 Enduro has a larger fuel tank capacity of 13 liters.

Now, let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The FE 501 2016 has become significantly lighter compared to previous models, making it easier to handle. It is also considered the strongest model in its class. On the other hand, it is the most expensive model, which can be a drawback for some buyers.

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

The 701 Enduro 2017, on the other hand, has an extremely powerful and fascinating single-cylinder engine, making it a thrilling ride. Its chassis is known for being indestructible and high-quality, allowing for hard enduro use. Additionally, it is praised for its ability to perform wheelies. However, it has a high seat height, which may not be suitable for shorter riders. The front brake is also considered to be slightly weak for hard road use, and the bike may feel unstable at high speeds.

In conclusion, both the Husqvarna FE 501 2016 and the Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The FE 501 is lighter and has better handling, while the 701 Enduro has a more powerful engine and a durable chassis. Buyers should consider their specific needs and preferences when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FE 501 2016 compared to Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna FE 501 2016
Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore95 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke84.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.6
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement510.4 ccmDisplacement690 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,504 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height910 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

Husqvarna FE 501 2016

The touring tractor can now also count itself among the lightweights. Dry under 110 kg and well over 60 hp leave no room for excuses. It carries even the Wildecker Herzbuben (both of them) up every slope.

Total weight has become significantly lighter, strongest model, significantly better handling

most expensive model

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017

The Husqvarna 701 Enduro can really do a lot. It rides Hardenduro sections and is a faithful companion in everyday life. On the one hand it is reliable and suitable for everyday use, but on the other hand it is much more radical than "normal" motorbikes. On fast passages, you miss a bit of stability and wind protection / riding comfort. All in all, however, it can do more than the brochure promises.

Extremely powerful and fascinating single-cylinder engine

indestructible and high-quality chassis

hard enduro use possible

awesome wheelie machine.

High seat height, front brake a little too weakly dimensioned for hard road use

unstable at high speeds.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FE 501 vs Husqvarna 701 Enduro

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna FE 501 2016 and a Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2017. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna 701 Enduro with 54 days compared to 116 days for the Husqvarna FE 501. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 501 and 8 reviews for the Husqvarna 701 Enduro since model year 2016. The first review for the Husqvarna FE 501 was published on 7/14/2016 and now has more than 91,700 views. This compares to more than 148,000 views for the first review on Husqvarna 701 Enduro published on 11/11/2015.

Price Husqvarna FE 501

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna 701 Enduro

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG