Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020 vs. Ducati Monster 696 2011
Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020
Ducati Monster 696 2011
Overview - Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020 vs Ducati Monster 696 2011
The Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020 and the Ducati Monster 696 2011 are both naked bikes from Ducati, but they have significant differences in terms of performance, features, and overall riding experience.
Starting with the Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020, it is equipped with a powerful engine that produces 208 HP and 123 Nm of torque. The engine has four cylinders and is liquid-cooled, ensuring optimal performance and reliability. The displacement of the engine is 1103 ccm, providing ample power for exhilarating rides. The suspension system of the Streetfighter V4 S is top-notch, with Öhlins components both at the front and rear, ensuring excellent handling and stability. The bike features a 17-inch front and rear tire with widths of 120 mm and 200 mm, respectively. The wheelbase is 1488 mm, providing a stable and balanced ride. The seat height is 845 mm, which may be slightly high for some riders, but the seating position is surprisingly comfortable, even for taller riders. The fuel tank capacity is 16 liters, allowing for longer rides without frequent refueling. In terms of strengths, the Streetfighter V4 S boasts an exceptional electronics package, offering advanced features and controls. The engine is high-revving and brutally powerful, providing an adrenaline-pumping experience. The bike's handling is very agile, allowing for precise cornering and maneuverability. Despite its sporty nature, the seating position is surprisingly comfortable, even for taller riders. The brakes are powerful, ensuring excellent stopping power. The chassis is sporty and high-quality, contributing to the bike's overall performance. Additionally, the aerodynamics of the Streetfighter V4 S are great, providing stable wind conditions even at high speeds. Lastly, the bike has a visually stunning design that is sure to turn heads.
Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020
On the other hand, the Ducati Monster 696 2011 has a less powerful engine compared to the Streetfighter V4 S. It produces 80 HP and 69 Nm of torque from its two-cylinder air-cooled engine with a displacement of 696 ccm. The suspension system of the Monster 696 consists of Sachs components both at the front and rear, ensuring a comfortable and controlled ride. The bike features a 17-inch front and rear tire with widths of 120 mm and 160 mm, respectively. The wheelbase is slightly shorter than the Streetfighter V4 S at 1450 mm, but it still provides good stability. The seat height is lower at 770 mm, making it more accessible for riders with shorter inseams. The fuel tank capacity is 15 liters, which is slightly smaller than the Streetfighter V4 S. In terms of strengths, the Monster 696 has a low but relaxed seat height, making it easy to handle and maneuver in various riding conditions. The overall weight of the bike is relatively low, contributing to its agility and fun-to-ride nature. The braking system of the Monster 696 is also commendable, providing reliable stopping power.
Ducati Monster 696 2011
However, there are some weaknesses to consider for both bikes. The Streetfighter V4 S requires higher revs to unleash its full power, lacking low-end torque. This can make it somewhat challenging to navigate city traffic and everyday riding situations. Additionally, the bike's handling can feel tippy at low speeds, requiring extra attention and skill from the rider. The engine noise of the Streetfighter V4 S can also be strongly dependent on speed and flap position, which may be a downside for some riders. On the other hand, the Monster 696 can be difficult to handle at times, especially for less experienced riders. The digital instruments on the bike may also be poorly readable, potentially causing inconvenience.
In conclusion, the Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020 and the Ducati Monster 696 2011 offer different levels of performance, features, and riding experiences. The Streetfighter V4 S is a high-performance naked bike with exceptional power, handling, and advanced electronics. It is suitable for riders seeking an adrenaline-filled riding experience with top-level features. On the other hand, the Monster 696 is a more accessible and fun-to-ride naked bike, with a lower seat height and agile handling. It is suitable for riders looking for a more relaxed and enjoyable riding experience.
Technical Specifications Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020 compared to Ducati Monster 696 2011
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020
The bike has taken much of its sporty roots from the Panigale. This will delight friends of the streetfighter. Electronics and engine power are superior, the chassis is radically fast and the machine rules in stopwatch duels. However, it has rough edges. The big surprise: you sit well on the noble beast and can actually ride it on extended tours!
Ducati Monster 696 2011
Touring riders, those who like to travel and synchronised riders will not enjoy it due to the lack of mounting options for luggage systems and limited space on the pillion. But modern city dwellers, nimble country dwellers and hard-working weekend sportsmen will find the 696 the lubricant for the purpose - and at a relatively reasonable price.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Ducati Streetfighter V4 S vs Ducati Monster 696
There are a few key differences between a Ducati Streetfighter V4 S 2020 and a Ducati Monster 696 2011. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 14. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Streetfighter V4 S with 62 days compared to 66 days for a Ducati Monster 696. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 17 reviews for the Ducati Streetfighter V4 S and 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 since model year 2008. The first review for the Ducati Streetfighter V4 S was published on 3/26/2020 and now has more than 73,600 views. This compares to more than 7,300 views for the first review on Ducati Monster 696 published on 11/8/2007.