Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. Honda CB650R 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Honda CB650R 2021

Honda CB650R 2021

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs Honda CB650R 2021

The Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Honda CB650R 2021 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and performance.

Starting with the Yamaha MT-09 2017, it is equipped with a powerful in-line engine that produces 115 HP of power and 87.5 Nm of torque. The fuel system is injection-based, and it has three cylinders with liquid cooling. The displacement of the engine is 847 ccm. The front suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork, while the rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock absorber. The frame is made of aluminum, specifically a twin tube design. The front brakes are double disk type with a diameter of 298 mm. The bike also comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, quickshifter, and traction control. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm, a front tire diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 180 mm, a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1440 mm, a seat height of 815 mm, a kerb weight (with ABS) of 193 kg, and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

On the other hand, the Honda CB650R 2021 features an in-line engine that generates 95 HP of power and 63 Nm of torque. The fuel system is also injection-based, and it has four cylinders with liquid cooling. The displacement of the engine is 649 ccm. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, and the rear suspension is a swing arm with a monoshock absorber. The frame of the bike is made of steel, with a twin tube design. The front brakes are double disk type with a diameter of 310 mm. The bike comes with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm, a front tire diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 180 mm, a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, a wheelbase of 1450 mm, a seat height of 810 mm, a kerb weight (with ABS) of 202.5 kg, and a fuel tank capacity of 15.4 liters.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers several advantages. It features Öhlins suspension, which is a significant upgrade. The addition of an Akrapovic exhaust enhances both the bike's appearance and sound. The Magura HC3 radial brake pump provides excellent braking performance. The Carbon2Race covers add a grandiose aesthetic touch to the bike. Additionally, the combination of the seat, footrests, and handlebar clamps is highly effective.

On the other hand, the Honda CB650R 2021 has its own set of strengths. It boasts the Neo Sports Cafe optics, which is still highly regarded. The bike is suitable for beginners and offers a good price-performance ratio. The engine revs up smoothly, and it has low fuel consumption.

Honda CB650R 2021

Honda CB650R 2021

However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 does have some weaknesses. It requires a significant financial investment and may require a lot of working time for certain parts to be registered. Additionally, the ECU Flash is not road legal.

Similarly, the Honda CB650R 2021 has a few weaknesses. It may not provide enough space for tall riders, and the equipment is considered mediocre. The bike is relatively chubby, and it lacks punch from the rev range.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Honda CB650R 2021 are both naked bikes with their own unique features and strengths. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers superior performance with its powerful engine and advanced rider assistance systems. On the other hand, the Honda CB650R 2021 is more beginner-friendly and offers a good price-performance ratio. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to Honda CB650R 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2017
Honda CB650R 2021
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Honda CB650R 2021
Honda CB650R 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke46 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque63 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.6
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital, Transistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake64.5 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail101 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter310 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter240 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,120 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth750 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,150 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height810 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)202.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Honda CB650R 2021

Honda CB650R 2021

13 out of a possible 24 points mean 5th place in the large mid-range naked bike comparison test 2021. The Honda puts up a good fight against the technically more advanced competition and can leave a motorbike behind despite its position as an outsider. Pleasing looks, accessible riding and the low price make the shortcomings that were brought to light in the direct comparison fade into the background.

Neo Sports Cafe Optics still top

absolutely suitable for beginners

good price-performance ratio

engine revs up smoothly

low consumption

Too little space for tall riders

mediocre equipment

relatively chubby

little punch from the rev range

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Honda CB650R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a Honda CB650R 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2017 is about 21% higher. Compared to Honda CB650R 2021 there are less Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB650R with 63 days compared to 73 days for the Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 23 reviews for the Honda CB650R since model year 2019. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 53,700 views for the first review on Honda CB650R published on 10/8/2018.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CB650R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen