Husqvarna WR 125 2006 vs. Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 125 2006 vs Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 125 2006 compared to Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2006
Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement125 ccmDisplacement249.91 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight99 kgDry Weight107.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Husqvarna WR 125 2006

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

Husqvarna FE 250 2016

The entry-level four-stroke has also gained some more power. Nevertheless, the 250 remains almost foolproof and easy to ride. Secretly my favourite of the new 2017 models. Combines easy handling with a good-natured yet powerful engine.

Very easy to ride

the most beginner-friendly bike

most relaxed ride

She runs out of steam on endless steep rides

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 125 vs Husqvarna FE 250

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH