BMW S 1000 RR 2024 vs. Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

BMW S 1000 RR 2024

BMW S 1000 RR 2024

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2024 vs Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

BMW S 1000 RR 2024

BMW S 1000 RR 2024

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2024 compared to Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

BMW S 1000 RR 2024
Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke48.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power210 HPEngine power217 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power14,000 rpm
TorqueTorque113 NmTorque113 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,000 rpmRpm at Torque12,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.3 Compression Ratio13.6
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,000 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel125 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel143 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin-Spar
RakeRake66.4 degreeRake65.3 degree
TrailTrail99.8 mmTrail101.9 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter330 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Monoblock

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,073 mmLength2,105 mm
WidthWidth846 mmWidth750 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,457 mmWheelbase1,455 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height824 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)197 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)201 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange257 kmRange246 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions149 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions155 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.4 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.7 l/100km

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED-Headlights, TFT displayEquipmentKeyless System, LED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2024

BMW S 1000 RR 2024

For me, the most noticeable of all the innovations were the electronics and the steering geometry. Thanks to the additional information of the new steering angle sensor and the revised riding aids, the new S1000RR now has an electronic package with which you can not only ride safely, but also quickly, which will especially please the faster faction. But with a few additional features such as Slide Control, the average rider also has the opportunity to try out the riding style of the pros without risk, in order to cut a good figure in riding photos. And apart from that, it's also fun. The new steering geometry brings a little more calmness to the front and improves feedback, which is an invaluable advantage, especially at the limits. So the next round in the hunt for the best superbike is reopened.

Very good electronics or control systems

Good feedback

Good stability

Engine vibrations

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP 2024

The SC82 was already a hit when it was released in 2020 with the aforementioned minor flaws, which Honda has now successfully eliminated in 2022. A big advantage for road and race track. The new Fireblade is once again a top performer for both disciplines and is sure to secure a place at the very top.

Great engine

Good electronics set-up

Top rideability and feedback

Knee angle very narrow, especially for taller riders

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CBR1000RR-R Fireblade SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH