BMW S 1000 RR 2010 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 RR 2010 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The BMW S 1000 RR model year 2010 is a supersport motorcycle that offers superior performance and a range of well-functioning driving aids. With an engine type of in line and a displacement of 999 ccm, it delivers a powerful 192 HP and 112 Nm of torque. The compression ratio is 13 and it has four cylinders. The bike features a telescopic fork front suspension and a swing arm rear suspension. The frame is made of aluminium and has a twin tube frame type. The front brakes are double disk with four pistons and radial technology. The front tyre width is 120 mm and the rear tyre width is 190 mm. The wheelbase is 1432 mm and the seat height is 820 mm. The kerb weight with ABS is 207 kg and the fuel tank capacity is 17.5 l.

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R model year 2014 is a naked bike that offers a sporty chassis and extreme power and performance. It has the same engine type and displacement as the S 1000 RR, with a bore of 80 mm and a stroke of 49.7 mm. However, the engine power is slightly lower at 160 HP, while the torque remains the same at 112 Nm. The compression ratio is 12 and it also has four cylinders. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork, while the rear suspension is a swing arm. The frame is made of aluminium and has a twin tube frame type. The front brakes are double disk with four pistons and radial technology. The dimensions and weights are similar to the S 1000 RR, with a front tyre width of 120 mm, rear tyre width of 190 mm, wheelbase of 1439 mm, seat height of 814 mm, kerb weight with ABS of 207 kg, and fuel tank capacity of 17.5 l.

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 offers superior performance and well-functioning driving aids, making it a very fast and capable motorcycle. It also has an optimal price, providing good value for its performance. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 boasts a sporty chassis and extreme power and performance, with very good electronic helpers. It also has a terrific price/performance ratio, making it a great option for riders looking for a fast and comfortable bike on both the racetrack and country roads.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

However, the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 does have some weaknesses. It may lack agility and have complicated handling, which can affect the overall riding experience. It may also have issues with braking stability due to its high weight. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 has a slightly rough engine running and the DDC (Dynamic Damping Control) system, while effective, may still be on the "hard" side overall. The seat is relatively high, which may not be ideal for shorter riders, and the design is subjective and may be a matter of taste.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 RR 2010 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are powerful motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 RR 2010 offers superior performance and well-functioning driving aids, while the S 1000 R 2014 provides a sporty chassis and extreme power and performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2010 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 RR 2010
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power192 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,750 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,056 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth826 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,432 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

BMW S 1000 RR 2010

We have a strict and merciless order from the boss to thank for that. There are tough performance checks before the S 1000 RR leaves the factory. At BMW, they didn't want to show their hand and risk even one disappointing test bench report finding its way into the media.

Superior performance

well-functioning driving aids

very fast

optimal price.

Agility

complicated handling

braking stability

high weight.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 RR 2010 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2014 is about 3% higher. A BMW S 1000 RR 2010 experiences a loss of 1,080 USD in one year and 2,310 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 590 USD and 610 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are less BMW S 1000 RR 2010 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 52 days compared to 70 days for a BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW S 1000 RR was published on 4/16/2008 and now has more than 4,000 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG