Husqvarna TE 450 2005 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 450 2005 vs Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 450 2005 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna TE 450 2005
Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement293 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight116 kgDry Weight103 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Very powerful engine and good performance in the MX special stage. Clean straight-line running in deep soil. Swedish steel is back! The Husky brings even heavier kilos wonderfully smoothly through the worst mud pits and up the steep slope without any problems.

Positive handling

low price

stability

decent performance

robust.

Agility

complicated handling - requires strength.

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 450 vs Husqvarna WR 300

Price Husqvarna TE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH