KTM 450 SMR 2010 vs. Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
KTM 450 SMR 2010
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Overview - KTM 450 SMR 2010 vs Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
In comparing the KTM 450 SMR 2010 and the Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005, there are several notable differences to consider. Starting with the technical specifications, both models have a single cylinder engine with a displacement of around 450cc. However, the KTM has a slightly larger displacement at 449.3cc compared to the Husqvarna's 449cc.
Moving on to the dimensions and weights, the KTM has a slightly shorter wheelbase at 1475mm, while the Husqvarna has a longer wheelbase at 1495mm. This may affect the handling and maneuverability of the bikes. In terms of seat height, the KTM stands taller at 920mm, while the Husqvarna has a lower seat height of 885mm. This may be a factor for riders of different heights.
KTM 450 SMR 2010
In terms of weight, the KTM is lighter with a dry weight of 111.5kg, while the Husqvarna is slightly heavier at 121kg. This weight difference may contribute to the KTM's optimal weight and potentially better handling.
Moving on to the strengths of each model, the KTM 450 SMR 2010 boasts an optimal weight, strong and efficient braking systems, lots of power, and low maintenance requirements. These strengths suggest that the KTM may be a reliable and high-performance option for riders.
On the other hand, the Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 is praised for its supermoto geometry, handy chassis, high performance, and a rev-happy engine. These strengths suggest that the Husqvarna may excel in terms of agility and performance on the track.
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
However, both models also have their weaknesses. The KTM 450 SMR 2010 is noted to have a higher price due to its racing special equipment. This may make it less accessible for some riders. On the other hand, the Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 is criticized for its rancid-looking bicycle speedometer, potential reliability issues, and not being suitable for everyday use. These weaknesses suggest that the Husqvarna may require more maintenance and may not be as versatile for various riding conditions.
In conclusion, the KTM 450 SMR 2010 and the Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers optimal weight, strong braking, power, and low maintenance, while the Husqvarna excels in supermoto geometry, chassis, performance, and a rev-happy engine. However, the KTM comes at a higher price and the Husqvarna may have reliability and everyday use concerns. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's specific preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications KTM 450 SMR 2010 compared to Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
KTM 450 SMR 2010
KTM and enduros - it just fits. The racing machine used by Hannes Maier surpasses the series version once again.
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005
In everyday use, experienced pilots immediately feel at ease and have a lot of fun zipping through the traffic. However, inexperienced pilots are somewhat overwhelmed by the spontaneous and sporty characteristics.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 450 SMR vs Husqvarna SM 450 R
There are a few key differences between a KTM 450 SMR 2010 and a Husqvarna SM 450 R 2005. It takes less time to sell a KTM 450 SMR with 53 days compared to 83 days for a Husqvarna SM 450 R. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the KTM 450 SMR and 5 reviews for the Husqvarna SM 450 R since model year 2005. The first review for the KTM 450 SMR was published on 8/8/2010 and now has more than 28,400 views. This compares to more than 3,900 views for the first review on Husqvarna SM 450 R published on 2/16/2004.
