BMW C 650 GT 2020 vs. Yamaha TMAX 560 2020
BMW C 650 GT 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2020
Loading...
Overview - BMW C 650 GT 2020 vs Yamaha TMAX 560 2020
BMW C 650 GT 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2020
Technical Specifications BMW C 650 GT 2020 compared to Yamaha TMAX 560 2020
BMW C 650 GT 2020
Yamaha TMAX 560 2020
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 79 mm | Bore | 70 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 66 mm | Stroke | 73 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 60 HP | Engine power | 47.6 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 63 Nm | Torque | 55.7 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.6 | Compression Ratio | 10.9 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Belt |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Variomatic | Transmission Type | Automatic |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Lubrication | Lubrication | Dry sump | Lubrication | Dry sump |
Displacement | Displacement | 647 ccm | Displacement | 562 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Travel | Travel | 115 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Single swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Travel | Travel | 115 mm | Travel | 117 mm |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 270 mm | Diameter | 267 mm |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 270 mm | Diameter | 282 mm |
Assistance Systems
Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Anti-slipping control | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
---|
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 15 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 15 inch |
Length | Length | 2,235 mm | Length | 2,200 mm |
Width | Width | 916 mm | Width | 765 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,591 mm | Wheelbase | 1,575 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 800 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 261 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 218 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW C 650 GT vs Yamaha TMAX 560
Price BMW C 650 GT
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Yamaha TMAX 560
Model year
Current average market prices