BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs. Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2016 compared to Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

BMW F 700 GS 2016
Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke61.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power95.2 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,750 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque87 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.27
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement888 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustableAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRiding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WidthWidth855 mmWidth930 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,410 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,562 mmWheelbase1,556 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height810 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Triumph Tiger 900 GT 2021

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs Triumph Tiger 900 GT

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 900 GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH