BMW R nineT 2021 vs. BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2021
.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1168&height=664&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
BMW R nineT 2014
Loading...
Overview - BMW R nineT 2021 vs BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2021

BMW R nineT 2014
Technical Specifications BMW R nineT 2021 compared to BMW R nineT 2014
BMW R nineT 2021
BMW R nineT 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | Boxer | Engine type | Boxer |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 101 mm | Bore | 101 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 73 mm | Stroke | 73 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 109 HP | Engine power | 110 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,250 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,750 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 116 Nm | Torque | 119 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,000 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12 | Compression Ratio | 12 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Toughened, Dry | Clutch Type | Toughened, Dry |
Transmission | Transmission | Prop shaft | Transmission | Prop shaft |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Cooling | Cooling | Oil-air | Cooling | Oil-air |
Displacement | Displacement | 1,170 ccm | Displacement | 1,170 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Paralever | Suspension | Paralever |
---|
Chassis
Frame type | Frame type | Tubular, Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Load-bearing engine |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Technology | Technology | radial | Technology | radial |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,105 mm | Length | 2,220 mm |
Width | Width | 865 mm | Width | 890 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 805 mm | Seat Height | 785 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 221 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 222 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 18 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW R nineT 2021

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
BMW R nineT 2014
.jpg?format=webp&quality=80&trim.threshold=80&trim.percentpadding=1&scale=both&width=1388&height=980&bgcolor=rgba_39_42_44_0&mode=pad)
Very worthy retro machine. The other classic manufacturers really need to catch up.
Optics, engine, fork, workmanship
A touch too little rebound damping in the shock absorber
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R nineT vs BMW R nineT
Price BMW R nineT
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW R nineT
Model year
Current average market prices