BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs. BMW F 900 XR 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW F 900 XR 2020

BMW F 900 XR 2020

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2014 vs BMW F 900 XR 2020

The BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the BMW F 900 XR 2020 are both impressive motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the BMW S 1000 R 2014, this naked bike boasts a powerful inline 4 engine with 160 HP and 112 Nm of torque. It features a chain transmission and a displacement of 999cc. The suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. The frame is made of aluminum and has a twin tube design. The braking system includes double disk brakes with four pistons in the front, utilizing radial technology. The S 1000 R also comes equipped with advanced rider assistance systems, such as dynamic suspension. It has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 190mm, both with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1439mm and the seat height is 814mm. With a kerb weight of 207kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters, the S 1000 R offers a sporty and powerful riding experience.

On the other hand, the BMW F 900 XR 2020 is a sport touring motorcycle with a slightly less powerful inline 2 engine, producing 105 HP and 92 Nm of torque. It also features a chain transmission and a displacement of 895cc. The suspension setup is similar to the S 1000 R, with an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. However, the frame is made of steel and has a twin tube design with a load-bearing engine. The braking system includes double disk brakes with four pistons in the front, utilizing radial technology. In terms of rider assistance systems, the F 900 XR offers ABS, anti-slipping control, and riding modes. The front tire width is 120mm and the rear tire width is 180mm, both with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase measures 1518mm and the seat height is 815mm. With a kerb weight of 211kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 15.5 liters, the F 900 XR is designed for comfortable sport touring.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 excels in its sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, and very good electronic helpers. It also offers a terrific price/performance ratio and is fast and comfortable on both the racetrack and country roads.

On the other hand, the BMW F 900 XR 2020 has its own set of strengths. It boasts a resilient and powerful engine, variable ergonomics for customizable comfort, and sufficient wind protection for long rides. The Brembo brakes are also great, providing excellent stopping power. Additionally, the F 900 XR has stylish looks and a wide range of accessories to personalize the bike to the rider's preferences.

BMW F 900 XR 2020

BMW F 900 XR 2020

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 does have a few weaknesses. Some riders may find the engine running slightly rough, and while the dynamic suspension control (DDC) works well, it can still be on the "hard" side overall. The seat is relatively high, which may not be ideal for shorter riders, and the design is subjective and may not appeal to everyone's taste.

As for the BMW F 900 XR 2020, one weakness mentioned is the behavioral sound. This could be a subjective issue for some riders who prefer a quieter ride.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2014 and the BMW F 900 XR 2020 are impressive motorcycles with their own set of strengths and weaknesses. The S 1000 R offers extreme power and performance with a sporty chassis, while the F 900 XR provides a resilient engine and comfortable sport touring capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the motorcycle.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2014 compared to BMW F 900 XR 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2014
BMW F 900 XR 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.1
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter43 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,518 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)211 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

BMW F 900 XR 2020

BMW F 900 XR 2020

The new BMW F 900 XR proves that it now needs no more than the middle class. With 105 hp, you are never underpowered in any situation and the two-cylinder offers enough elasticity to be both relaxed and very sporty on the road. Its solid quality and proven high-volume technology of the F 850 series make it a perfect companion if you want to be sporty on the road with a high level of comfort. As a basis, the equipment is sufficient, but the BMW accessories programme gives enough options to put together your dream motorbike (recommendation: Gearshift Assistant Pro!).

Resilient and powerful engine

Variable ergonomics

Sufficient wind protection

Great Brembo brakes

Stylish looks

Wide range of accessories

Behavioural sound

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW F 900 XR

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2014 and a BMW F 900 XR 2020. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW F 900 XR 2020 is about 10% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2014 experiences a loss of 590 USD in one year and 610 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 740 USD and 830 USD for a BMW F 900 XR 2020. Compared to BMW F 900 XR 2020 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 19 compared to 13. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 75 days for a BMW F 900 XR. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 23 reviews for the BMW F 900 XR since model year 2020. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 136,400 views for the first review on BMW F 900 XR published on 11/5/2019.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 XR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG