BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs. BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2016 vs BMW R 1200 GS 2012

The BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 are both enduro motorcycles, but they have some key differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 has a bore of 82 mm and a stroke of 75.6 mm, while the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 has a larger bore of 101 mm and a shorter stroke of 73 mm. This means that the F 700 GS has a smaller engine displacement of 798 ccm compared to the R 1200 GS's 1170 ccm. However, the R 1200 GS has a higher engine power of 110 HP compared to the F 700 GS's 75 HP. The torque is also higher in the R 1200 GS at 120 Nm, compared to the F 700 GS's 77 Nm. Additionally, the F 700 GS has a chain transmission, while the R 1200 GS has a prop shaft transmission. Both motorcycles have 2 cylinders.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

In terms of suspension, the F 700 GS has a swing arm suspension at the rear, while the R 1200 GS has a single swing arm suspension. Both motorcycles have a double disk front brake system. The rear tire width is wider in the F 700 GS at 140 mm, compared to the R 1200 GS's 110 mm. The wheelbase is longer in the F 700 GS at 1562 mm, compared to the R 1200 GS's 1507 mm. The seat height is lower in the F 700 GS at 820 mm, compared to the R 1200 GS's 850 mm. The fuel tank capacity is also smaller in the F 700 GS at 16 l, compared to the R 1200 GS's 20 l.

In terms of strengths, the F 700 GS is praised for being very manageable and surprisingly powerful. It also has a comfortable seating position and a low seat height, making it accessible for riders of different heights. The brakes are reported to be good, and the price is considered to be reasonable.

On the other hand, the R 1200 GS is praised for its optimal wind protection and comfortable seat. It also has a good posture and positive ergonomics, making it comfortable for long rides. The chassis is described as quiet and weather robust, indicating its durability in different conditions.

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

In terms of weaknesses, the F 700 GS is criticized for its optics, although no specific details are provided. The R 1200 GS's only weakness mentioned is that the seat is a little too low, which may not be comfortable for taller riders.

Overall, the BMW F 700 GS 2016 and the BMW R 1200 GS 2012 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The F 700 GS is praised for its manageability and power, while the R 1200 GS is praised for its comfort and ergonomics. Riders should consider their own preferences and needs when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2016 compared to BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW F 700 GS 2016
BMW R 1200 GS 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke73 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power110 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque120 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeToughened, Dry
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSingle swing arm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height80 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,210 mm
WidthWidth855 mmWidth915 mm
HeightHeight1,240 mmHeight1,450 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,562 mmWheelbase1,507 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height850 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
Top SpeedTop Speed192 km/hTop Speed200 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

BMW R 1200 GS 2012

Either it was a stroke of luck or the best developers were at work - handlebars, geometry, seat, knee angle, footrests - it just fits really well for the majority of Central Europeans. All in all, there is still no motorbike that can kill the GS.

Optimal wind protection

comfortable seat

good posture

positive ergonomics

weather robust

quiet chassis.

Seat a little too low.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs BMW R 1200 GS

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 700 GS 2016 and a BMW R 1200 GS 2012. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1200 GS 2012 is about 42% higher. A BMW F 700 GS 2016 experiences a loss of 220 USD in one year and 350 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 570 USD and 820 USD for a BMW R 1200 GS 2012. Compared to BMW R 1200 GS 2012 there are less BMW F 700 GS 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 23. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 GS with 58 days compared to 90 days for the BMW F 700 GS. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 7 reviews for the BMW F 700 GS and 98 reviews for the BMW R 1200 GS since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW F 700 GS was published on 7/2/2012 and now has more than 18,800 views. This compares to more than 19,100 views for the first review on BMW R 1200 GS published on 1/20/2004.

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R 1200 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH