Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement576 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,505 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height940 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight140 kgDry Weight140.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Husqvarna TE 610 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH