KTM 390 Duke 2017 vs. Yamaha XJ6 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Loading...

Overview - KTM 390 Duke 2017 vs Yamaha XJ6 2009

The KTM 390 Duke 2017 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and characteristics.

In terms of engine power, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a clear advantage with 78 HP compared to the KTM 390 Duke 2017's 44 HP. The Yamaha also has a higher torque of 59.7 Nm compared to the KTM's 35 Nm. This means that the Yamaha XJ6 2009 will provide a more powerful and responsive ride, especially in terms of acceleration and top speed.

The KTM 390 Duke 2017, on the other hand, has a single cylinder engine, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a four-cylinder engine. This difference in cylinder configuration affects the overall performance and smoothness of the ride. The Yamaha's four-cylinder engine provides a smoother power delivery and a more refined performance compared to the KTM's single-cylinder engine.

Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which ensure optimal engine temperature and performance. This is particularly important for long rides or in hot weather conditions.

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

In terms of suspension, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 features an Upside-Down telescopic fork, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a telescopic fork. The Upside-Down fork on the KTM provides better handling and stability, especially during aggressive riding or cornering.

The chassis of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is made of chromium-molybdenum, which is known for its strength and lightweight properties. This contributes to the bike's low weight and nimble handling. The Yamaha XJ6 2009, on the other hand, has a steel frame with a double cradle design. While this frame provides good stability and durability, it may add some weight to the bike.

Both bikes have 17-inch front and rear tires, which offer good grip and stability on the road. The wheelbase of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is slightly shorter at 1367 mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 2009's 1440 mm. This shorter wheelbase contributes to the KTM's agility and maneuverability, making it easier to handle in tight corners or city traffic.

In terms of seat height, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 has a higher seat height of 830 mm compared to the Yamaha XJ6 2009's 785 mm. This may be a factor to consider for riders with shorter inseams or those who prefer a lower seating position.

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

The fuel tank capacity of the KTM 390 Duke 2017 is 13.4 liters, while the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a larger capacity of 17.3 liters. This means that the Yamaha will have a longer range before needing to refuel, which can be advantageous for longer rides or touring.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 offers a sporty seating position, low weight, TFT display, and a sharp appearance. These features contribute to a more aggressive and dynamic riding experience. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 is praised for its rider-friendly performance characteristics, optimal clutch, playful and lighter handling, seat comfort, and individual look. These strengths make the Yamaha a more versatile and comfortable bike for various riding styles.

As for weaknesses, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 does not have any specific weaknesses mentioned. On the other hand, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 is noted to have design components that are not too demanding and a torque development that may not be as strong as some riders prefer.

In conclusion, the KTM 390 Duke 2017 and the Yamaha XJ6 2009 are both capable naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a sportier and more aggressive riding experience, while the Yamaha provides a more versatile and comfortable ride. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and intended use of the bike.

Technical Specifications KTM 390 Duke 2017 compared to Yamaha XJ6 2009

KTM 390 Duke 2017
Yamaha XJ6 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore89 mmBore65.5 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke44.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power44 HPEngine power78 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque35 NmTorque59.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio12.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement373.2 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,367 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.4 lFuel Tank Capacity17.3 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 390 Duke 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2017

It's actually incredible how much fun you can have with less than 50 hp. The KTM 390 Duke is a little fun cannon that you won't find anywhere else in a hurry. Its sporty set-up with the front-wheel-oriented seating position makes it a true cornering predator - you don't need any more in the angular gear. The sharp looks and the TFT display give it a very high-class appearance.

Sporty seating position

low weight

TFT display

sharp appearance

nix

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Despite the common basis, the XJ appears much younger and more aggressive. A mid-cass motorbike that by no means makes you feel mid-range. Except for the swingarm, the motorbike appears quite high-quality and cool. The bike is a little easier to handle than the Diversion.

rider-friendly performance characteristics

optimal clutch

playful, lighter handling

seat comfort

individual look

young

aggressive

high-quality.

Design components not too demanding

torque development

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 390 Duke vs Yamaha XJ6

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2017 and a Yamaha XJ6 2009. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 390 Duke 2017 is about 3% higher. A KTM 390 Duke 2017 experiences a loss of 130 USD in one year and 310 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 200 USD and 20 USD for a Yamaha XJ6 2009. Compared to Yamaha XJ6 2009 there are more KTM 390 Duke 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 8 compared to 6. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XJ6 with 31 days compared to 66 days for the KTM 390 Duke. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 4 reviews for the Yamaha XJ6 since model year 2009. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 21,900 views for the first review on Yamaha XJ6 published on 11/13/2008.

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XJ6

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH