Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016
Kawasaki Z900 2017
BMW S 1000 R 2016
Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016
The Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line 4-cylinder engines. However, there are several differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a clear advantage with 160 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 125.4 HP. This means that the BMW offers more raw power and acceleration, making it a better choice for riders who prioritize speed and performance.
Similarly, the torque on the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is higher at 112 Nm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 98.6 Nm. This higher torque allows for better low-end power and acceleration, making the BMW more responsive and easier to handle in various riding conditions.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 comes with the added advantage of a dynamic suspension system, which provides better control and stability during cornering and braking.
Kawasaki Z900 2017
The chassis of the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is made of steel, while the BMW S 1000 R 2016 features an aluminum frame. The aluminum frame offers better rigidity and lighter weight, resulting in improved handling and maneuverability for the BMW.
Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with four pistons, ensuring powerful and reliable braking performance. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has the advantage of radial brake technology, which provides better modulation and control during braking.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1450 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R 2016's 1439 mm. The seat height on the BMW is also slightly higher at 814 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. However, the difference in wheelbase and seat height is minimal and may not significantly impact the riding experience.
In terms of weight, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is slightly lighter with a kerb weight of 207 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2017's 210 kg. This lighter weight contributes to better agility and maneuverability for the BMW.
In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a well-balanced engine with good torque. It is also considered to offer a great balance between performance, price, and practicality.
BMW S 1000 R 2016
On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position.
As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is noted to have a narrow knee angle, which may be uncomfortable for taller riders. However, this can be addressed by ordering a different seat.
The BMW S 1000 R 2016 is noted to have expensive optional extras, which may make it less accessible for some riders. Additionally, the chassis is described as being on the harder side, which may result in a slightly less comfortable ride.
Overall, both the Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki offers a good balance between performance and practicality, while the BMW provides more power and advanced features. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's priorities and preferences.
Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Kawasaki Z900 2017
An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!
BMW S 1000 R 2016
With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs BMW S 1000 R
There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2017 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 28% higher. A Kawasaki Z900 2017 experiences a loss of 520 USD in one year and 920 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 380 USD and 1,940 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2016. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 43 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 85 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.
