BMW M 1000 R 2023 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

Kawasaki Z900 2023

Kawasaki Z900 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW M 1000 R 2023 vs Kawasaki Z900 2023

The BMW M 1000 R 2023 and the Kawasaki Z900 2023 are both powerful naked bikes with inline engines and liquid cooling. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW M 1000 R takes the lead with 210 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 125 HP. The BMW also has higher torque at 113 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 98.6 Nm. This means that the BMW offers more power and acceleration, making it suitable for riders who enjoy high-speed performance.

Both bikes have four cylinders and fuel injection systems, ensuring efficient and smooth power delivery. The BMW has a larger displacement at 999 ccm, while the Kawasaki has a slightly smaller displacement at 948 ccm. This may result in a slight difference in overall performance and throttle response.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with monoshock at the rear. The BMW offers more adjustability with compression, preload, and rebound adjustments for both the front and rear suspension. The Kawasaki only offers preload and rebound adjustments for its suspension. Additionally, the BMW has an aluminum swing arm, while the Kawasaki's swing arm material is not specified.

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

In terms of chassis, the BMW features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design that acts as a load-bearing engine. On the other hand, the Kawasaki has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons, ensuring strong stopping power. However, the BMW has larger front brake disks with a diameter of 320 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 300 mm. The BMW also utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, which may provide better heat dissipation and improved braking performance.

When it comes to advanced rider assistance systems, the BMW offers a wide range of features including ABS, electronically adjustable suspension, riding modes, dynamic suspension, cornering ABS, launch control, ride by wire, shift assistant with blipper, cruise control, traction control, and anti-wheelie. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, offers a more limited set of assistance systems including ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. The BMW's advanced rider assistance systems provide more options for customization and enhanced safety.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. However, the BMW has a wider rear tire at 200 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 180 mm. Both bikes have a wheelbase of 1450 mm, but the BMW has a higher seat height at 840 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 795 mm. The BMW also has a lower kerb weight with ABS at 199 kg, while the Kawasaki weighs slightly more at 212 kg.

Kawasaki Z900 2023

Kawasaki Z900 2023

In terms of equipment, both bikes feature LED daytime running lights, LED headlights, and TFT displays. However, the BMW offers additional features such as connectivity, heated grips, and a keyless system. These additional features enhance convenience and comfort for the rider.

In terms of strengths, the BMW M 1000 R stands out with its powerful and controllable motor, adjustable electronics, good feedback from the chassis, stable brakes, and surprising maneuverability. The standard cruise control and heated grips also make it suitable for long rides on country roads. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 offers light and natural handling with high stability, a silky engine with full pull from low revs, high chassis transparency, and a comfortable seating position. It also comes at an absolutely fair price.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW M 1000 R's main drawback is its high price, which may make it less accessible for some riders. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 has a relatively cumbersome menu operation and lacks slope-dependent assistance systems. It also has a higher weight compared to the BMW.

Overall, the BMW M 1000 R 2023 and the Kawasaki Z900 2023 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more power, advanced rider assistance systems, and additional features, but comes at a higher price. The Kawasaki, on the other hand, provides a more affordable option with a comfortable seating position and a smooth engine. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences, budget, and intended use.

Technical Specifications BMW M 1000 R 2023 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023
Kawasaki Z900 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power210 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque113 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.3 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore48 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter45 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel140 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake66 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail96.3 mmTrail105 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Dynamic suspension, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width200 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth820 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height840 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)212 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
Stationary noiseStationary noise98 dBStationary noise97 dB

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentConnectivity, Heated grips, Keyless System, LED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT displayEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

The M 1000 R is definitely well done and the whole package fits. Even though it is certainly aimed more at sporty riders, the bike can also prove itself well on longer country road rides with minor restrictions in terms of riding comfort. The lower, straight handlebars and forward seating position in combination with the higher footrests automatically result in a sportier dynamic that does not give rise to couch feelings, especially on longer rides. On the other hand, there is good contact with the front wheel and sufficient lean angle freedom. In combination with the powerful drive, the Hyper Naked definitely plays in the top league. Apart from slight vibrations, the powerful RR engine is a force to be reckoned with in the naked segment. The new electronics help even less experienced riders to release the concentrated power in a controlled manner with conservative settings.

powerful and at the same time well controllable motor

great and adjustable electronics

good feedback from the chassis

stable brakes

Surprisingly manoeuvrable when desired

Standard cruise control and heated grips top for country road use

High price

Kawasaki Z900 2023

Kawasaki Z900 2023

The Kawasaki Z900 may not be up to scratch when it comes to modern, lean angle-dependent electronic features, but it's relatively cheap and you shouldn't underestimate the fan base of the good old inline four - the Z900 is one of the cheapest ways to own such a great engine with just under a litre of displacement in a sporty naked bike! The higher weight is noticeable, but not massively annoying, because the handling and stability are quite alright. In terms of "outdated" electronics, the most annoying thing is the missing shift assistant, which is not even available as an option. Overall, however, the Z900 is a great naked bike with a great price-performance ratio.

Light and natural handling with high stability

silky engine with full pull from low revs

high chassis transparency, great feedback

seating position with feel-good factor

absolutely fair price.

Relatively cumbersome operation of the menu

no slope-dependent assistance systems

high weight

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW M 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a BMW M 1000 R 2023 and a Kawasaki Z900 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW M 1000 R 2023 is about 162% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z900 2023 there are less BMW M 1000 R 2023 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 187. It takes less time to sell a BMW M 1000 R with 40 days compared to 122 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2023 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the BMW M 1000 R and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the BMW M 1000 R was published on 10/11/2022 and now has more than 51,800 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price BMW M 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG