Honda CTX 700 N 2014 vs. Suzuki SV 650 2016

Honda CTX 700 N 2014

Honda CTX 700 N 2014

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Loading...

Overview - Honda CTX 700 N 2014 vs Suzuki SV 650 2016

Honda CTX 700 N 2014

Honda CTX 700 N 2014

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Technical Specifications Honda CTX 700 N 2014 compared to Suzuki SV 650 2016

Honda CTX 700 N 2014
Suzuki SV 650 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeV
BoreBore73 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke80 mmStroke62.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power47.6 HPEngine power76 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque60 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,750 rpmRpm at Torque8,100 rpm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeDual-clutchTransmission TypeGearshift
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement670 ccmDisplacement645 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, TubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,255 mmLength2,130 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth760 mm
HeightHeight1,155 mmHeight1,080 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,530 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height720 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)227 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)197 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.4 lFuel Tank Capacity13.8 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CTX 700 N 2014

Honda CTX 700 N 2014

Although the CTX700N is a colourful bird, it is currently only available in black or white. And at a price for which other manufacturers cannot offer nearly as much technology, quality, rideability and fun. A really refreshing experiment - successful!

Extremely low fuel consumption

nimble, agile driving

automatic transmission

interesting driving dynamics.

Lack of half fairing

no pannier set as standard.

Suzuki SV 650 2016

Suzuki SV 650 2016

The new SV650 continues the visual minimalism of the first two SV650 generations, but builds technically on its direct predecessor, the SFV650 Gladius - two excellent moves that turn the very modern SV650 into a classic. The design fits wonderfully into the era of many retro conversions, but inside there are also modern gimmicks that make it easier for beginners in particular to get started. The engine, on the other hand, can also convince advanced riders; the typical V2 feeling is wonderful. You shouldn't expect extreme sportiness in the chassis and brakes, but the price of just under 6400 euros (in Germany) is a statement that the competition will have to swallow.

Agile, powerful engine

typical V2 sound

pleasant and low seating position

easy handling

comfortable chassis

brakes with good control

Poorly readable digital tachometer

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CTX 700 N vs Suzuki SV 650

Price Honda CTX 700 N

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki SV 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG