KTM 390 Duke 2016 vs. BMW G 310 R 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - KTM 390 Duke 2016 vs BMW G 310 R 2017

The KTM 390 Duke 2016 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both popular naked bikes in the market, each with its own set of strengths and weaknesses.

Starting with the technical specifications, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 boasts an engine power of 44 HP and a torque of 35 Nm, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 offers slightly lower figures with 34 HP of engine power and 28 Nm of torque. Both bikes have a single cylinder and a displacement of around 300-400 ccm. In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 has a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 has a steel frame. Both bikes have a tubular frame type and single disk brakes at the front. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are quite similar, with both having a front tire width of 110 mm, a front tire diameter of 17 inches, a rear tire width of 150 mm, a rear tire diameter of 17 inches, and a wheelbase of around 1370 mm. The seat height of the KTM 390 Duke 2016 is slightly higher at 800 mm compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's seat height of 785 mm. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 also has a lower kerb weight of 139 kg compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 158.5 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 11 liters.

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Now let's discuss the strengths of each bike. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 is known for its low weight, which contributes to its agility and maneuverability. It also offers sufficient power for an enjoyable riding experience, making it a fun bike to ride. Additionally, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 has a relatively low fuel consumption, which is a desirable feature for cost-conscious riders. On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2017 is praised for its smooth response, providing a comfortable and enjoyable ride. It also has a low seat height, making it more accessible for riders of different heights. The BMW G 310 R 2017 also stands out with its pretty design, appealing to riders who value aesthetics. Lastly, the bike has a throaty sound, adding to the overall riding experience.

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 has been criticized for its sluggish clutch, which can be a drawback for riders looking for quick and smooth gear changes. Additionally, some riders find the small geometry of the bike to be uncomfortable, especially for taller individuals. On the other hand, the BMW G 310 R 2017 has been noted to have individual components that look cheap, which can affect the overall perception of the bike's quality.

In conclusion, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both solid choices in the naked bike category, each with its own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM 390 Duke 2016 offers low weight, sufficient power, high fun factor, and low consumption, while the BMW G 310 R 2017 provides a smooth response, low seat height, pretty design, and a throaty sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 390 Duke 2016 compared to BMW G 310 R 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2016
BMW G 310 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore89 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke62 mm
Engine powerEngine power44 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque35 NmTorque28 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio10.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement373.2 ccmDisplacement313 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountdirect

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,367 mmWheelbase1,374 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)139 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

The KTM 390 Duke is a really good compromise between sportiness, reason, riding comfort, fun and price. Best of all: it doesn't feel like a compromise at all, but like it's ready to race.

Low weight

sufficient power

high fun factor

low consumption

Sluggish clutch

small geometry

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

The BMW G 310 R scores with easy handling that should not overtax any beginner. The great responsiveness of the single cylinder makes it easy to control, and the low seat height gives a secure footing at traffic lights. For reasons of cost, savings were made in some corners, which unfortunately also becomes visible. In comparison, the workmanship is not on a par with the competition.

Smooth response

low seat height

pretty design

throaty sound

Individual components look cheap

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2016 and a BMW G 310 R 2017. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 9. It takes less time to sell a KTM 390 Duke with 60 days compared to 75 days for a BMW G 310 R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 11/12/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 10/7/2015.

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG