Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2023

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Kawasaki Z650 2023

Kawasaki Z650 2023

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2017 vs Kawasaki Z650 2023

The Yamaha MT-09 2017 and the Kawasaki Z650 2023 are both naked bikes that cater to different preferences and riding styles.

In terms of engine performance, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 takes the lead with its in-line 3-cylinder engine that delivers 115 HP of power and 87.5 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2023 features a 2-cylinder engine that produces 68 HP of power and 65.7 Nm of torque. The Yamaha MT-09 has a larger displacement of 847cc compared to the Kawasaki Z650's 649cc. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 offers more power and torque, making it a more exhilarating ride for those seeking a high-performance naked bike.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature a swing arm with a monoshock rear suspension. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 comes equipped with an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension, while the Kawasaki Z650 2023 features a telescopic fork front suspension. The upside-down telescopic fork on the Yamaha MT-09 provides better stability and control during aggressive riding, giving it an advantage in terms of suspension performance.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

When it comes to the chassis, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 features an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design, which provides a good balance between rigidity and weight. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2023 has a steel frame with a tubular design. While the aluminum frame on the Yamaha MT-09 is generally considered to be more advanced and lighter, the steel frame on the Kawasaki Z650 offers durability and affordability.

Both bikes come equipped with double disk front brakes, but the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly smaller diameter of 298mm compared to the Kawasaki Z650 2023's 300mm. Both bikes also feature advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control, ensuring safety and stability during braking and acceleration.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a wheelbase of 1440mm and a seat height of 815mm, while the Kawasaki Z650 2023 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1410mm and a lower seat height of 790mm. The Yamaha MT-09 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 14 liters compared to the Kawasaki Z650's 15 liters. In terms of weight, the Yamaha MT-09 weighs slightly more at 193kg compared to the Kawasaki Z650's 187.1kg.

Kawasaki Z650 2023

Kawasaki Z650 2023

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers additional features such as Öhlins suspension, Akrapovic exhaust for improved aesthetics and sound, and Magura HC3 radial brake pump for enhanced braking performance. The Kawasaki Z650 2023, on the other hand, is praised for its accessible handling, compact and maneuverable design, and adjustable levers.

However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 requires a higher financial investment and more working time for certain parts to be registered. Additionally, the ECU flash on the Yamaha MT-09 is not road legal. The Kawasaki Z650 2023, on the other hand, may not provide enough space for taller riders, has a smaller overall appearance for a 650cc bike, and features a more defensive seating position with narrow and cranked handlebars.

In conclusion, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 offers more power, superior suspension, and additional features, making it a more performance-oriented naked bike. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2023 provides accessible handling, a compact design, and adjustable levers, making it a great option for riders seeking a lightweight and maneuverable naked bike. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z650 2023

Yamaha MT-09 2017
Kawasaki Z650 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power68 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque65.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio10.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel125 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular
RakeRake65 degreeRake65.5 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail100 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter300 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height790 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)193 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)187.1 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Kawasaki Z650 2023

Kawasaki Z650 2023

The Kawasaki Z 650 is probably the most docile motorbike in the naked bike segment. And that is to be understood in an absolutely positive way - as long as you are not particularly tall and heavy. It is slim, light, agile and accessible. All the controls, but also the engine, do not overwhelm. If you are looking for spectacular performance, you should go for the Z 900, but if you are looking for a nimble and easy-to-ride motorbike, you will be satisfied.

Very accessible handling

Very compact and easy to manoeuvre

Motorcycle appears light and compact

Gives small riders a lot of confidence

Adjustable levers

Not enough space on the bike for tall riders

bike looks a class smaller than 650cc overall

engine looks a bit tame

very defensive seating position

handlebars too narrow and cranked too much for a naked bike.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Kawasaki Z650

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2017 and a Kawasaki Z650 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2017 is about 17% higher. Compared to Kawasaki Z650 2023 there are less Yamaha MT-09 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 243. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 146 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 6/10/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 11/8/2016.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH