KTM 690 Duke 2016 vs. Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 Duke 2016 vs Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

The KTM 690 Duke 2016 and the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and capabilities.

Starting with the KTM 690 Duke 2016, it is powered by a single-cylinder engine with a power output of 73 HP and a torque of 70 Nm. The liquid-cooled engine provides smooth running and low vibrations, making it suitable for everyday use. The bike features a chromium-molybdenum frame and a tubular frame type, ensuring stability and durability. The suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The front brakes, with a diameter of 320 mm, are equipped with four pistons and radial technology from Brembo. The bike also features advanced rider assistance systems such as Ride by Wire. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm, a rear tire width of 160 mm, a wheelbase of 1466 mm, and a seat height of 835 mm. The kerb weight, including ABS, is 149.5 kg, and the fuel tank capacity is 14 liters.

On the other hand, the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 is equipped with a twin-cylinder engine that delivers a higher power output of 95 HP but a slightly lower torque of 67 Nm. The liquid-cooled engine provides an easy-to-operate experience with a good sound. The bike features an aluminum frame with a load-bearing engine, ensuring stability and precise handling. The suspension consists of an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, branded by Kayaba, and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The front brakes, with a diameter of 320 mm, are equipped with four pistons and radial technology from Brembo. The bike offers extensive electronics, including ABS, riding modes, launch control, ride by wire, quickshifter, traction control, and anti-wheelie, although some of these features may come at an extra cost. The dimensions and weights include a front tire width of 120 mm, a rear tire width of 180 mm, a wheelbase of 1370 mm, and a seat height of 820 mm. The kerb weight, including ABS, is higher at 183 kg, and the fuel tank capacity is slightly larger at 15 liters.

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

In terms of strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 is known for its versatility and suitability for everyday use. The bike has a highly developed single-cylinder engine that provides smooth running and low vibrations. It is also praised for its smooth and easy handling.

On the other hand, the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 is appreciated for its easy-to-operate engine with a good sound. The bike has a sporty appearance and offers sporty handling. It also has good ergonomics and decent brakes. The extensive electronics, including ABS, riding modes, quickshifter, and traction control, enhance the riding experience.

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

However, both bikes have some weaknesses. The KTM 690 Duke 2016 may not be sporty enough for the racetrack, and the Track Pack is available at an extra cost.

Similarly, the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 is criticized for its price-performance ratio, which may not be considered ideal by some. Additionally, the IMU package, which includes advanced features like cornering ABS and wheelie control, is available at an extra cost.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2016 and the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM 690 Duke 2016 offers versatility and a highly developed single-cylinder engine, while the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 provides an easy-to-operate engine, sporty handling, and extensive electronics. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2016 compared to Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

KTM 690 Duke 2016
Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore102 mmBore81 mm
StrokeStroke84.5 mmStroke63.93 mm
Engine powerEngine power73 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpm
TorqueTorque70 NmTorque67 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio13.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesRocker arm, OHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement690 ccmDisplacement659 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandKayaba
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel135 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel135 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeLoad-bearing engine
RakeRake63.5 degreeRake65.9 degree

Brakes Front

DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter240 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
BrandBrandBremboBrandBrembo

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by WireAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,466 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height820 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)149.5 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)183 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2, A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2016

KTM 690 Duke 2016

It is unbelievable how cultivated KTM has developed the single-cylinder without sacrificing performance. It can be considered a stroke of genius that, within the framework of the EURO4 standard, the engine's running culture was raised while at the same time increasing power. The flat torque curve is responsible for the smooth, powerful propulsion. From 4000 revs, the Duke pushes hard and revs up to 8500 revs. Even at low revs, the engine does not stutter or swallow, which is an advantage in the city. The Duke's greatest strength, apart from its rideability, is its manoeuvrability, which is why it can confidently be called a toy. It's only when you're on the racetrack and attacking hard that you wish you had the "R" under your bum.

suitable for everyday use

smooth running

low vibration

highly developed single-cylinder engine

versatile

Track Pack at extra cost

not sporty enough for the racetrack

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

The Tuono delivers on the bends what the name promises. The sporty naked bike rides precisely and you enjoy the sporty corner chase. At the exit of the bend, however, one wishes for more emotion and adrenaline. The sporty expectation is naturally also created by the Tuono's racy appearance and cheeky demeanour. But this expectation is unfortunately not quite fulfilled in the saddle.

Easy-to-operate engine with good sound

successful appearance sporty handling

good ergonomics

decent brakes

extensive electronics - but partly at extra cost

stable and precise chassis

Price / performance ratio not right

IMU package costs extra

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs Aprilia Tuono 660

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2016 and a Aprilia Tuono 660 2021. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 is about 61% higher. Compared to Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 there are less KTM 690 Duke 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 14 compared to 16. It takes less time to sell a KTM 690 Duke with 78 days compared to 122 days for a Aprilia Tuono 660. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 8 reviews for the Aprilia Tuono 660 since model year 2021. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 9/28/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 52,500 views for the first review on Aprilia Tuono 660 published on 11/5/2019.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Aprilia Tuono 660

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH