Husqvarna TE 450 2005 vs. Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 450 2005 vs Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 450 2005 compared to Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Husqvarna TE 450 2005
Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight116 kgDry Weight120.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Very powerful engine and good performance in the MX special stage. Clean straight-line running in deep soil. Swedish steel is back! The Husky brings even heavier kilos wonderfully smoothly through the worst mud pits and up the steep slope without any problems.

Positive handling

low price

stability

decent performance

robust.

Agility

complicated handling - requires strength.

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Husqvarna SM 450 R 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 450 vs Husqvarna SM 450 R

Price Husqvarna TE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna SM 450 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG