KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2014

The KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both powerful naked bikes with impressive performance capabilities. However, they have some notable differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 takes the lead with 173 HP, while the BMW S 1000 R 2014 offers 160 HP. The KTM also has a higher torque of 144 Nm compared to the BMW's 112 Nm. The KTM has a larger engine displacement of 1301ccm, whereas the BMW has a displacement of 999ccm. Both bikes have a suspension front with upside-down telescopic forks and four-piston front brakes with radial technology.

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

When it comes to the chassis, the KTM features a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW has an aluminum frame. The KTM's frame type is tubular, while the BMW's frame type is twin tube. Both bikes have the same front and rear tire dimensions, with a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes offer ABS and traction control. However, the BMW also has dynamic suspension, which is not present in the KTM. The KTM has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1482mm compared to the BMW's 1439mm. The seat height of the KTM is also slightly higher at 835mm, while the BMW has a seat height of 814mm. The KTM has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters, while the BMW has a capacity of 17.5 liters.

In terms of strengths, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is praised for its monstrous engine and torque, wide rev range, strong brakes, extensive electronics, great extras, high-quality details, and aggressive looks. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2014 is commended for its sporty chassis, extreme power and performance, very good electronic helpers, terrific price/performance ratio, and its ability to perform well on the racetrack and country roads.

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The KTM's automatic gearshift is criticized for being a little too coarse. The BMW's engine running is described as slightly rough, and its DDC (dynamic suspension) is considered to be on the "hard" side overall. The BMW also has a relatively high seat and its design is subjective, being a matter of taste.

In conclusion, the KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 and the BMW S 1000 R 2014 are both impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a more powerful engine and torque, while the BMW excels in terms of its sporty chassis and price/performance ratio. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore108 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power173 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height814 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016

KTM knows no turning back and KTM knows no quarter. That's why the new 1290 Super Duke R is a little easier to handle than its predecessor, but also a little stronger and faster. Already at 2500 rpm, over 100 Nm are available, the maximum is 141, the top performance is stated at 177 hp. That may be too much, but it doesn't have to be. The electronics remain the lifeline in this category, where development continues to move forward strongly. KTM has started where it had difficulties and that was stability. Changes to the geometry and chassis have improved this significantly, making the ride on the beast not only faster, but also safer. The handling is no less radical for that, and the supermoto genes are more evident than on any other naked bike. There can only be one Super Duke.

Monstrous engine and torque

wide rev range

little vibration

strong brakes

extensive electronics

great extras

high-quality details

unrivalled aggressive looks.

Automatic gearshift a little too coarse

BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.

Sporty chassis

extreme power and performance

very good electronic helpers

terrific price/performance ratio

fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.

Slightly rough engine running

DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall

seat relatively high

tempts to overdrive

design a matter of taste.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 and a BMW S 1000 R 2014. In terms of price, the actual average price of a KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 is about 14% higher. A KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 experiences a loss of 670 USD in one year and 1,840 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 590 USD and 610 USD for a BMW S 1000 R 2014. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014 there are more KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 25 compared to 19. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 70 days compared to 81 days for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 65 reviews for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 1290 Super Duke R was published on 11/8/2012 and now has more than 4,900 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 11/3/2013.

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG