KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs. Husqvarna FE 450 2015

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Loading...

Overview - KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 vs Husqvarna FE 450 2015

The KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 450 2015 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine and drive train, the KTM 350 EXC-F has a smaller bore and stroke compared to the Husqvarna FE 450. This means that the KTM has a slightly smaller displacement of 349.7ccm, while the Husqvarna has a displacement of 449.3ccm. Additionally, the KTM 350 EXC-F has both electric and kick starters, while the Husqvarna FE 450 only has a kick starter.

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks for their front suspension, with the same brand (WP) being used for both models. The rear suspension also uses WP brand components. The chassis for both motorcycles is made of steel and has a central tube frame type.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have the same front tire diameter of 21 inches and rear tire width of 140mm. The rear tire diameter is also the same at 18 inches. The wheelbase and seat height are identical for both models, measuring at 1482mm and 970mm respectively. However, there is a slight difference in dry weight, with the KTM 350 EXC-F weighing 107.2kg and the Husqvarna FE 450 weighing 113kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of 9 liters.

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 is praised for its power, agility, and speed. It is considered a real racing machine and combines the advantages of a four-stroke engine with lightness and sufficient power. On the other hand, the Husqvarna FE 450 2015 is known for its power and ease of driving. It has superior handling in almost every situation and is stable yet manageable. The build quality of the Husqvarna is also highly regarded, with its mature concept being proven thousands of times over.

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 350 EXC-F is described as more radical and slightly more nervous compared to the 250 and 450 models. It requires more concentration but also offers more speed. The pull-through has improved, but some riders still wish for the perfection of a 450. As for the Husqvarna FE 450, it is considered slower than a 350 or a two-stroke on the special stage. Additionally, the extra weight of the Husqvarna compared to the 350 models can be felt after a crash when picking up the motorcycle.

In conclusion, the KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 450 2015 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a powerful and agile racing experience, while the Husqvarna provides power and ease of handling. Riders should consider their preferences and riding style when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 compared to Husqvarna FE 450 2015

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016
Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore88 mmBore95 mm
StrokeStroke57.5 mmStroke63.4 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.3 Compression Ratio11.8
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement349.7 ccmDisplacement449.3 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height970 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107.2 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

The box-office hit of recent years has been improved with pinpoint accuracy. The usable rev range has been widened, making the 350 a little easier to ride than before. But it still feels like the most radical machine among the 4-stroke models. It combines the advantages of the "250" and "450" but also their disadvantages. Nevertheless: 90% of all KTM customers will set the fastest time on the special test with the 350 EXC-F. It is the most universal purchase recommendation for enduro racers.

Powerful, agile, fast - a real racing machine

The advantages of the four-stroke (engine response, dosing, consumption,...) combined with lightness and sufficient power.

More radical than the 250 and a bit more nervous than the 450. Requires more concentration but also offers more speed

pull-through has improved, but still not so perfect that you don't sometimes wish you had a 450.

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Still the golden mean. Much easier to ride than a 350. Not quite as nervous, but just a tad more ponderous. It has no end of power and torque. The 501 is frankly superfluous. This bike is not too weak for anyone. Probably not the coolest choice, 450 was "mainstream" for years, but in the course of a hard enduro week the best partner you could wish for. The few extra kilos are quickly forgotten on the leisurely connecting stages. During the test we also rode it with a Rekluse automatic clutch. This worked great and saved power.

lots of power but still easy to drive

superior handling in almost every situation

not nervous, not tippy, stable but manageable enough

high build quality

mature concept, proven thousands of times over

Slower than a 350 or a two-stroke on the special stage

After the crash you are reminded of the extra pounds compared to 350s - if you have to pick them up

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 350 EXC-F vs Husqvarna FE 450

There are a few key differences between a KTM 350 EXC-F 2016 and a Husqvarna FE 450 2015. It takes less time to sell a KTM 350 EXC-F with 76 days compared to 97 days for a Husqvarna FE 450. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 18 reviews for the KTM 350 EXC-F and 7 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 450 since model year 2014. The first review for the KTM 350 EXC-F was published on 11/2/2010 and now has more than 10,800 views. This compares to more than 21,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FE 450 published on 10/16/2013.

Price KTM 350 EXC-F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHSchuberthMotorex AG