Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs. TM SMR 125 2011

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

TM SMR 125 2011

TM SMR 125 2011

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2016 vs TM SMR 125 2011

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

TM SMR 125 2011

TM SMR 125 2011

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2016 compared to TM SMR 125 2011

Husqvarna TE 125 2016
TM SMR 125 2011
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna TE 125 2016
Husqvarna TE 125 2016
TM SMR 125 2011
TM SMR 125 2011

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandMarzocchi

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity8.7 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

TM SMR 125 2011

TM SMR 125 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen